Editorial: Lament our current state of affairs, and then …
Whatever followers of Jesus may think about the most pressing issues of our day, we ought to be able to lament our current state of affairs.
I know that’s a vague statement, but I want to start where we ought to be able to agree. I’ll be more specific soon enough.
I do believe our current state of affairs is lamentable. That may be where some of us start to disagree, at least in so far as which specific state or states I find lamentable. You and I may not find the same thing(s) lamentable. So, let me go back to where I think we can agree.
The world is broken. Christians agree on that. A broken world is lamentable. Again, we can agree. Brokenness is a result of sin. Sin and its resulting brokenness hurt and harm all of creation. It complicates life in compounding ways. It even kills—body, mind, and spirit. I believe we’re still in agreement.
Brokenness requires a response. Jesus responded by giving himself for us. Jesus broke sin’s power and set restoration in motion, so brokenness will be no more. I lament that it took that, and I rejoice that he did it.
…
Sorry, I had to stop for a moment to be still with what I just wrote, to hold lament in one hand and rejoicing in the other. To sit in awe of Jesus.
…
We want to skip lament, or better yet, ignore it. We want to go straight to rejoicing. But we must not skip lament. You see, our lament is our agreement with God that this world is not as God created it to be. Our lament witnesses to our hope in the reality of wholeness. No, we must not skip lament.
Lament is a proper response to brokenness, but only a first response. There is more we as Christians are to do in response.
A specific example
Yes, brokenness requires a response. We, not just Jesus, must respond to brokenness, and we who follow Jesus must respond as he commanded and in his character.
Too often, our responses either come out of brokenness or generate more brokenness. We’ve seen and experienced this to be true. I lament our contribution(s) to brokenness by how we respond to brokenness.
I will give a specific example. Here is where we are likely to disagree, perhaps mightily, on some, many, or all points.
U.S. immigration policy is broken. Why and how is it broken? Since decades of debate, opinion, and ink have been poured out in failed attempts to answer those two questions, I’m not going to try here. I’ll just say the system is broken.
U.S. immigration enforcement is broken. It has been and is spotty, overwhelmed, and confused all at the same time. This is a natural outgrowth of broken policy. Sadly, U.S. immigration enforcement is broken to the point of violence. This is lamentable, and I don’t say that flippantly.
Lament, don’t condemn
We have good reason, too many reasons, to lament. Here is one.
I see yet another video of federal immigration officers shooting and killing a U.S. citizen, and I lament. Why? Because it didn’t have to come to that. We can argue about how exactly it came to that, but none of our arguments, none of our facts, none of our being right (or wrong) makes it OK that a human being was shot to death.
God didn’t create people to be shot to death. Every time, it’s to be lamented. Every time.
Millions, and maybe billions, of people saw the same video, and if our social media feeds are any indication, most skipped lament and jumped straight to condemnation. We are primed for condemnation. This is lamentable.
Whether out of lament or condemnation—often both—countless people have called for U.S. immigration enforcement to be brought to heel. Since the shooting of Alex Pretti by federal immigration officers, the call has grown to include a host of Republican officials voicing their criticisms, however qualified.
Right here, we can break into that mighty disagreement with each other. We can call each other names, impugn each other’s motives, question each other’s understanding of Scripture, and even doubt each other’s salvation. We’ve seen and experienced all of this, this perfect example of brokenness, this lamentable condition between fellow Christians.
But we must not give in to brokenness, to the sin that so easily entangles us. Instead, we must see past the surface and all its details. We must see into where things are broken, including in us, and we must grieve that so much in us and in our world is not as God intended. We must lament the pervasiveness of sin and sin’s effects.
And we must not stop there.
And then …
For lament to be legitimate, for its hope to be realized, we must move to redemption, restoration, reconciliation. Christians are duty-bound to do so.
I’m certain many will want me to spell out how followers of Jesus are to move into redeeming, restoring, reconciling. I won’t. The list is too long. The details are too many. And we will be tempted to argue over whatever is said or not said.
I can hear some asking, “What does redemption, restoration, reconciliation look like?”
In the short term, it looks like a lot of work from a lot of people for a long time. It looks like missteps and great leaps, failures and successes, going backward and forward, giving and receiving. It looks like wondering if things can or will get better and being glad when it does get better.
In the long term, it looks like so many ways of wholeness. Vague? Yes. But no less true.
The most concrete suggestion I can make, the best place I know to start on redeeming, restoring, reconciling is to submit ourselves to Jesus, to his teaching, and to the Holy Spirit’s guidance. They will lead us to what to do and where.
They will also show us, when Jesus took in the state of the world, he lamented.
Eric Black is the executive director, publisher and editor of the Baptist Standard. He can be reached at eric.black@baptiststandard.com. The views expressed in this opinion article are those of the author.