Commentary: A critique of Franklin Graham’s compassion

Franklin Graham recently expressed his reservations about the Church of England’s decision to conduct trial blessing services for same-sex couples.

On Nov. 21, 2023, Graham shared on his Facebook page that it was “a sad day for the Church of England,” basing his disagreement on his belief in the biblical definition of marriage.

However, this moral stance faces scrutiny when juxtaposed with his support for Israel’s actions, particularly in the ongoing Gaza war—a situation widely condemned as a form of genocide against the Palestinian people.

Graham’s support for Netanyahu

Graham’s recent meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a tumultuous period in the region has come under intense scrutiny. Despite the extensive losses and destruction in Gaza, Graham portrayed Netanyahu—seen by many as a war criminal—as the one in need of prayers and support. This raises concerns about the selectivity of Graham’s compassion, especially given the severity of the situation.

A perusal of Graham’s Facebook page and the Samaritan’s Purse website, where Graham serves as president, reveals a substantial focus on Israel and a notable absence of coverage on Palestine. This not only impacts Graham’s Christian authenticity, but also questions the credibility of the organization as an objective evangelical Christian humanitarian aid group.

While not suggesting a shift to “hating” Israelis or halting aid, it is crucial to be objective, credible and honest when addressing the Palestinian people, their cause and their suffering.

Furthermore, Graham’s unwavering endorsement of Israel’s actions in the ongoing Gaza war, despite numerous allegations of human rights abuses, war crimes and genocide, contributes to the perception of inconsistency in his actions.

By aligning himself with the oppressor and praising Netanyahu without addressing the origin of the conflict and the suffering of the Palestinian people, Graham’s stance raises profound questions about the universality of his compassion and the moral compass he adheres to.

Betrayal of Palestinian Christians

“Sometimes you look and say, ‘Why?’ Or you look and say, ‘Lord, what can we do?’ The need is so great. But we serve a big God and he’s familiar with suffering. … So, we’re going to do what we can to help the people here in Israel. And do it in Jesus’ name,” Graham said during his recent visit to Israel.

His statement not only is a betrayal to all Palestinians and Arabs, but it also is deeply hurtful when viewed through the eyes of Palestinian and Arab Christians. This also disrespects the millions of Christians globally who sympathize with the Palestinian cause.

The irony deepens when contemplating the plight of Palestinian Christians, who have faced substantial losses during the ongoing war, encompassing killings, ethnic cleansings, destroyed homes, businesses, hospitals and churches.

Graham’s failure to acknowledge the suffering of these Christians and his apparent alignment with Netanyahu, the one accountable for their oppression, contradicts the principles of compassion and justice inherent in Christianity.

Significantly, Graham’s apparent disregard for the challenges faced by Palestinian Christians, who according to Christian doctrine do not fall under the category of enemies, raises concerns about the consistency of his genuine care and support for all individuals affected by the conflict.

The absence of advocacy for specific prayers for Palestinian Christians, especially those sharing the same church community, is unsettling and prompts inquiries into the depth of his compassion. Was there even any consideration for their emotions, pain and suffering?

Why not pray for all parties?

This prompts the question: If Graham genuinely believes in the efficacy of prayer and adheres to Jesus’ teachings, why not extend prayers to perceived enemies?

Underlining the necessity to pray for the well-being and safety of all parties involved, including Palestinian Christians and churches, could contribute to a more inclusive and compassionate narrative.

The apparent dichotomy of compassion displayed by Graham raises important questions about the consistency of his beliefs and actions. The selective focus on certain issues and the neglect of others, particularly regarding the suffering of the Palestinian people, challenges the integrity of individuals claiming to speak on behalf of God.

As Christians, it is essential to embody the teachings of Jesus with an unwavering moral stance that upholds the principles of compassion, justice and inclusivity.

Action beyond prayer

Christians possess both spiritual and political influence, granting them a pivotal role in advocating for enduring peace, equality, liberty and justice. Mere prayers are not enough. We must take bold and resolute action to prioritize the well-being of all parties involved.

This commitment necessitates unwavering condemnation of violence; the eradication of occupation, apartheid and discrimination; and the unwavering advocacy for equal rights and dignity, free from any form of prejudice.

Let us passionately engage in initiatives that propel lasting peace, steadfastly uphold human rights and ardently foster justice, leaving a tangible and significant impact on a more equitable and peaceful world. Let our actions embody the teachings of Christ.

By critically examining influential figures such as Graham, we can navigate the complexities of global conflicts with a clear moral compass rooted in Christian principles. Consistently adhering to these principles allows us to strive for a world where compassion, justice and inclusivity triumph over selective compassion and global hypocrisy.

As an Arabic proverb wisely suggests, the depth of our admonishment reflects the depth of our love for others.

Jack Nassar is a Christian in Ramallah, Palestine, who strives to foster positive change in the public, private, nonprofit and academic realms. The views expressed are those of the author.