Tarleton students see encounter with accident-victim as no accident

Posted: 3/28/08

Tarleton students see encounter
with accident-victim as no accident

About a dozen students from Tarleton State University traveled to South Padre Island to offer free van rides, pancake breakfasts and words of Christian witness to partiers on spring break. But they never expected to render emergency first aid to accident victims and minister to anyone in a hospital.

“Our group had an experience unlike any I have ever encountered at beach reach in the past three years,” said Stephen Alexander, Baptist Student Ministries intern at Tarleton.

See Complete Spring Break Ministry Coverage Here

At about 1 a.m., the volunteers who provided van rides came upon an accident scene. Fortunately, one of the Tarleton students, Brian Salge, is an emergency medical technician and trained first-responder.

“He was the first EMT on the scene and immediately started giving first aid,” Alexander recalled.

The other students prayed and comforted the friends of the two students involved in the accident.

Later, the Tarleton team learned the injured couple—Steven Clements and his friend, Stacy—had been hit by a car while trying to cross a street.

“Steven had used his body to protect Stacy and had suffered a severe knee injury,” Alexander said. “Our group was able to take seven of their friends to the hospital that night to visit them, and we had the opportunity to pray and minister to that group the entire night.”

The Tarleton ministry team continued to visit the couple in the hospital. They learned Steven was from Scotland and was in the United States on a scholarship.

“We were able to talk to them about how God must have plans for their lives to keep them safe like he did,” Alexander said. Stacy was discharged the next day with just minor cuts and bruises, but Steven had to remain hospitalized and undergo three operations on his knee.

“On the third day we went to visit Steven, he asked us for a Bible and asked us if we could pray for him before we left,” Alexander recalled. “He told us he could not understand it, but when we prayed with him, he felt no pain and a peace that he had never felt before.”

The student missionaries gave Steven and Bible, advised him to start reading in the Gospel according to John, and told him they would be back the next day.

“When we went back the following day we talked about what he had read and what it meant to be born again. Steven accepted Christ that day was ready to tell the world about it,” Alexander said.

“It was amazing to see God’s hand in all these events from Brian the EMT being in the van to our arriving on the scene just moments after the accident. God was in it all. Stacy has returned to school in Oklahoma and Steven will be going back to Scotland for rehab on his knee. His hopes and prayers are to recover and be able to play soccer for the Lord now.”





News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




RIGHT or WRONG? Political correctness

Posted: 3/28/08

RIGHT or WRONG?
Political correctness

More and more, when I treat people as I believe a Christian should, other people dismiss my actions by saying something like, “That’s so PC”—politically correct. Even Christians seem to reject Jesus’ statement, “Love one another.” How should I respond?


One good way to begin to respond to your Christian critics would be to quote more of the words of Jesus. For example, Jesus made it clear that loving God and one another are the two great commandments. Jesus said: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets” (Matthew 22:37-40).

How far does this second commandment reach? Hear again the words of Jesus: “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. … For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you salute only your brethren, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? You, therefore, must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect” (Matthew 5:43-48).

That’s a tall order, obviously. But it’s one Christians must strive to meet. Meeting that obligation includes loving all God’s children, including our enemies and those who differ from us in their skin color, religion, gender, nationality, sexual orientation, and political attitudes and affiliations.

Does loving all God’s children mean that we must affirm (or keep silent about) actions that violate spiritual standards? No. After all, Jesus had words of correction regarding actions that crossed the line. For example, he condemned not only the failure to love one’s neighbors, but also showy piety, the worship of money, self-exaltation and apathy toward the plight of the poor, the sick and the hungry. Likewise, we should hold fast to Christian standards and call for faithfulness to them.

But in doing so, we should remember at least three other biblical admonitions. First, we should deal with the “logs” in our own eyes before attempting to remove the “specks” in others’ eyes (Matthew 7:1-5). Second, we must speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15). And third, we should remember we see through a glass darkly—we cannot know all God knows (Corinthians 13:12). As I read the Bible, we are called to practice this kind of love. It is not “political correctness” or any human invention. It is a gift from God, and it is one that we must share with others.

Melissa Rogers, director

Center for Religion & Public Affairs

Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, N.C.

Right or Wrong? is sponsored by the T.B. Maston Chair of Christian Ethics at Hardin-Simmons University's Logsdon School of Theology. Send your questions about how to apply your faith to btillman@hsutx.edu.




News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




DBU president’s leukemia in remission

Posted: 3/26/08

DBU president’s leukemia in remission

By Ken Camp

Managing Editor

Dallas Baptist University President Gary Cook has learned his leukemia is in remission, and the possibility of a recurrence appears slim.

“I have wonderful news. God has healed me,” Cook wrote in a March 25 posting on the DBU website. “The 1 million-cell genetic study has been completed, and I have no cancer cells. I am in remission!”

The study confirmed the findings of recent preliminary pathology reports from a bone marrow biopsy.

Cook was diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia during his annual physical Oct. 12, 2007. He was immediately hospitalized at Baylor Medical Center, received a platelet transfusion and began chemotherapy. He completed the last round of chemotherapy Feb. 13.

Ninety percent of the patients with AML who go into remission never experience a recurrence, Cook reported. He will continue oral medication for the next year and half.

In his statement on the DBU website, Cook expressed thanks to all who had prayed for him and his family during his illness and treatment.

“I am so blessed that the Lord has allowed for this to just be a bend in the road and not the end of the road,” he wrote.




News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Bible Studies for Life Series for April 6: Moving out of your comfort zone

Posted: 3/26/08

Bible Studies for Life Series for April 6

Moving out of your comfort zone

• Genesis 12:1-8; 13:5-9, 14-16

By Gary Long

Willow Meadows Baptist Church, Houston

“Burning bush” moments are hard to come by these days. That is to say, when we read the Bible and grasp the ways in which God has spoken in ages past, we might be tempted to think God doesn’t operate in understandable ways anymore—at least not in our lives. Perhaps the reason for this has to do more with our inattentiveness to God, a fear to follow God or a lack of faith that God actually will lead us somewhere.

Abram was presented a two-part challenge we are called to hear as well. He was told to “leave” and “go.”


Leaving home

Genesis 12 starts with the simple assertion that Abram hears God’s voice telling him to leave home. Your learners can find easy identification with Abram if you can help them connect to their experiences of leaving home.

Consider sharing one of your “leaving home” experiences, then ask them to share as well. You will likely find common threads in the stories of leaving, including fear, anxiety, excitement and a sense of adventure.

When we are called to go someplace new, it naturally causes anxiety. There are many different situations under which people leave home. Soldiers leave home for war with a legitimate fear they may never see loved ones again. College freshmen leave home with wings spreading in flight. Even adolescents preparing to leave for something short term like summer camp can identify with the angst surely Abram experienced. Some of your learners may have left troubled marriages and consider the escape from an abusive spouse as an exodus that took a huge amount of courage and faith in God.


Go to the land I will show you

Recently, I took a trip out of town with a friend who has a device called a Garmin. It is a hand-held electronic unit that stores maps of the world and displays them on the screen. It works with global positioning satellites to let you know where you’re located. What’s more, it can be programmed to give you directions from where you are to any coordinates on the map. It will say, “right turn in 200 feet.” Or it will say, “U-turn and go back to the proper turn.”

I was impressed with the gadget and got hooked. I was glad we had the Garmin for the trip because it helped us find various destinations without asking directions, or really even thinking about where we were driving.

When I came home from the trip, I missed the little Garmin because I had to go back to thinking about how to get to my destinations in the car.

Abram’s story is different in obvious ways—humans had not even discovered electricity then, much less learned how to launch satellites into space. Abram took off to a new land by way of faith when he took God’s word to “go to the land that I will show you.” God offered no Garmin, no Google maps, not even an AAA “trip tik.” It was a simple command to “go” and trust that God would reveal the path along the way.

I grew up on a farm with cousins for neighbors. Unlike the rows of houses in suburban settings, our houses were separated by acres of corn.

One night, my dad asked me to run to my cousin’s house to get something. I slipped on my heavy coat for the bitter cold night and grabbed a flashlight to walk across the field of cut corn. There was no moon that night and as soon as I got out of the light cast by my own porch light, I was engulfed in complete darkness.

My little flashlight didn’t reveal very much, just a few feet ahead of me. While I knew the general direction of my cousin’s house, I still couldn’t track the path clearly. I had to rely on the little flashlight and take a few steps in what felt like the right direction. That would open the path to new spot of ground, and I could take a few more steps. I repeated this over and over until the light of his house showed up and I could navigate more clearly.

God’s calling of Abram seems to reflect that experience in that little by little he made his way to the land God would give him.

There is a call from God in our lives, too, that says, “Take a few steps. Don’t worry about the final destination, because I have that all planned out for you.”

Followers of God are called to take steps forward that, at times, may seem risky. The steps may seem to be going nowhere. But with a little light we see the path opening up for us gradually over time. So what light should we use?

The Psalmist says, “Your word is a light for my feet.” Perhaps a serious reading of the Bible will shed more light on your path. It is possible to read the stories of the heroes of the faith and learn from their experiences to shed light on our own paths. Or maybe the conversation with a close and trusted friend who shares your same beliefs in God can shed more light.

I’m also convinced that working on faith in community—with church family—has the ability to bring difficult situations in life into sharp focus.

The bottom line is that God expects us to pursue and discover his will for our lives. And God also expects us to act on our best understanding of God’s will. God always is calling the Christian forward in life, opening up new ways of engaging the world, new ways of trusting in God.

Each and every time we step forward in faith, we can be assured God is with us, God is directing us (if we will seek it) and God will not deprive us of what we need to deal with the changes that come at us in life.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Explore the Bible Series for April 6: When others hate you

Posted: 3/26/08

Explore the Bible Series for April 6

When others hate you

• Genesis 37:2-11, 17-20, 28

By Donald Raney

First Baptist Church, Petersburg

Humans were created to be in relationship with other humans. It is one of our most basic needs. That need can create in us a strong desire to be accepted by others. We often look for validation of ourselves through seeking the approval of others. This in turn can lead us to exaggerate in describing our accomplishments and blame others for our faults or shortcomings.

Yet, despite our best efforts, we find not everyone likes or accepts us. Even when we are truthful about ourselves, it seems there always will be someone who dislikes us.

These experiences usually start early in life and can have a formative effect on the person we become. This especially is true if those who seem to shut us out are relatives.

Often when we look back to the patriarchs of Israel, we have an initial or overriding vision of heroes of faith who always walked with God. But as we read their stories more closely, we find what would certainly qualify as dysfunctional families.

The story of Joseph’s relationship to his brothers is a prime example. Parental favoritism, jealousy, ill-advised words and actions all led to a situation in which nine older brothers hated their younger brother and sought to get rid of him. As we look at the story of Jacob’s sons, we can learn a lot about how to deal with those instances when we encounter people who seem to hate us.


Seek to do right (Genesis 37:2-4)

The stories of Israel’s patriarchs are full of sibling rivalry. It began with Isaac and Ishmael and seems to have intensified with each successive generation. Compounding the situation was the presence of blatant paternal favoritism. While one might expect Jacob would have learned the effects of such favoritism from his own experience with Isaac, it is clear he did not, and indeed lavished his preference for Joseph openly before his other sons.

This clearly created jealousy and tension between the brothers. The dislike which the older brothers held for Joseph only grew deeper as Joseph insisted on reporting on all of their activities to Jacob. The fact that no specifics are given and that Jacob did not appear to discipline the boys suggests the actions Joseph reported were not significant. When combined with the events which follow, these verses may indicate Joseph’s favored status had given birth to pride which blinded him to the consequences of his own actions.

As it does many other times, the Bible seems here to teach us what to do by presenting the opposite. While we should not be consumed with always doing whatever it takes to earn the approval of others, when we are aware of negative feelings others have toward us, we should always seek to do what is right and avoid unnecessarily providing fodder for their hate.


Seek to communicate wisely (Genesis 37:5-11)

Everyone knows by experience the truth that: “No man can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison” (James 3:8). We all have said things we later regretted or would have been best left unsaid. We do not mean to hurt feelings or cause others to form negative opinions or attitudes. Yet it often is the case that the reason one person or group dislikes another is less about who they are and more about something he or she said.

As we already have seen, Jacob’s favoritism of Joseph had laid the foundation for deep dislike between the older brothers and Joseph. That favoritism seems to have led Joseph to feel he could say anything and most often what he said only deepened the breach within the family. In fact, his descriptions of his dreams not only further alienated him from his brothers, but led to objections from Jacob. Joseph’s actions seem to lend support to the old saying that simply because something is true, does not mean it needs to be said.

This especially is true when it would lead to division within a biological family or within a church family. While we should always be willing to speak the truth in love, we also should always seek to carefully consider whether our words would build walls between us and others. In every situation, seek to use words wisely.


Seek to perform duties (Genesis 37:17-20, 28)

Abraham Lincoln wisely stated you cannot please all of the people all of the time. Despite our best efforts to the contrary, some people may simply refuse to like us. That, however, should never distract us from doing the work we feel God has called us to do, even in acts of reaching out to those people in loving service. Even though he certainly knew his brothers disliked him, Joseph continued to obey Jacob and assist his older brothers with their duties. One may wonder to what extent Joseph was aware of the depth of his brothers’ hatred and whether he assisted them out of love for them or duty to Jacob, but the fact is that Joseph did not allow his brothers’ feelings or attitudes prevent him from doing what he should.

Perhaps as we focus on pressing forward with performing our duties, we might disarm those who hate us and prepare a way for reconciliation and unity.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Obama campaign spotlights race, pulpit freedom

Posted: 3/20/08

Obama campaign spotlights race, pulpit freedom

By Robert Marus

Associated Baptist Press

WASHINGTON (ABP)—While the political consequences of Sen. Barack Obama’s March 18 speech on race created chatter for cable-news channels, the episode is noteworthy for another reason, according to experts in religion and politics.

For the first time in modern American history, a presidential candidate’s pastor and congregation are the cause of a major campaign controversy.

Sen. Barack Obama delivers a speech on race in response to controversy over remarks by his long-time pastor, Jeremiah Wright, who recently retired at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

Also, according to experts on the African-American tradition of prophetic preaching, the division over the Illinois Democrat’s former minister casts light on the difficulties black and white Americans still have in understanding each other’s religious culture.

“I just can’t come up with a good example—a good analogy—of one church, one pastor, even one sermon having this kind of effect on a candidate,” said Laura Olson, a Clemson University professor and expert in religion and politics.

Asked to think of a parallel situation in American presidential politics, Ouachita Baptist University political scientist Hal Bass had to reach nearly a century.

“Back in the late 19th and early part of the 20th century, when anti-Catholicism was hot and heavy in the United States … there were frequently allegations that the Catholic candidates for president—like Al Smith in ’28—were in the pocket of the pope,” he said. But comparing that to the present situation was like comparing “apples and oranges.”

Obama’s campaign has been assailed for weeks because of comments made by Jeremiah Wright, who recently retired after 36 years as senior pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Snippets of the messages—containing comments that some have interpreted as anti-American and anti-white—have been posted on YouTube and publicized by innumerable media outlets.

Obama has been an active member of the predominantly African-American congregation for more than 20 years and has credited Wright with helping bring him to Christ and being a spiritual mentor. The pastor married Obama and his wife, Michelle, and baptized the couple’s two daughters. His campaign autobiography, The Audacity of Hope, is named after one of Wright’s sermon titles.

In response to the uproar over Wright’s comments, Obama delivered a speech in Philadelphia in which he denounced his pastor’s most controversial statements. But he also asked those offended by Wright to understand the context in which a black preacher raised under the oppression of segregation might feel compelled to make controversial statements about race and a United States whose founding ideals were, as Obama put it, “stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery.”

Nonetheless, the candidate added, Wright’s words “expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country—a view that sees white racism as endemic, that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America.”

In that sense, Obama continued, “Rev. Wright’s comments weren’t only wrong, but divisive—divisive at a time at which we need unity.”

But to African-American ears, those divisive words can ring pretty true, according to Bill Leonard, dean of Wake Forest University Divinity School.

“In many ways, Jeremiah Wright exists in a community that both expects and needs him to wear the prophet’s mantle in ways that sound very painful in the public square—to the principalities and powers that occupy the public square,” said Leonard, who is white but has been an active member of historically African-American Baptist congregations for 16 years.

“And by that I mean, at least in the context of African-American preaching as I have experienced it for many years now, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Amos and Elijah and their very painful message to their culture is a living, breathing reality in African-American pulpits.”

Among the most inflammatory of Wright’s comments were ones taken from a 2003 sermon in which he discussed the U.S. government’s historically inequitable treatment of African-American citizens.

“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no. God damn America—that’s in the Bible—for killing innocent people,” Wright exclaimed. “God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”

A message Wright preached the Sunday after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks also has drawn significant fire. In it, he noted Americans seemed shocked and bewildered that anyone would want to visit their country with violence.

“We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye,” he said in the Sept. 16, 2001, sermon. “We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America’s chickens are coming home to roost.”

Olson, the Clemson political scientist, said one has to note the ministry context in which Wright made such statements. Trinity is a large congregation—the biggest in its denomination, which is overwhelmingly white. It has a tradition of social activism and operates multiple ministries for the disadvantaged. It is located in one of the poorest and most crime-ridden parts of Chicago’s South Side.

“So, you have to think a little bit about what the target audience is,” Olson said. “In a sense, if you’re Jeremiah Wright … you’re trying to inspire and you’re trying to give people hope and you’re trying to rile people up and get them to see things in a way that they maybe wouldn’t have seen things, and that you’re maybe trying to shake people out of a cycle of hopelessness. I mean, you’re not trying to tear down white America; your comments aren’t meant for that purpose.”

Many commentators have denounced Wright’s comments as “racist” or “anti-white.” In March 18 comments on MSNBC, former GOP presidential candidate Pat Buchanan—himself no stranger to racially charged language—accused Wright of “hate speech” that is “anti-American” and “anti-Christian.”

But many African-American preachers—and a handful of their white colleagues—have defended Wright vigorously.

Alfred Smith, pastor of Allen Temple Baptist Church in Oakland, Calif., and an early leader in the civil-rights movement, has been one of the most outspoken.

Wright’s white critics, Smith said, are “living in privilege in suburbia where a suburban gospel is preached. And we’re living in the inner city, where the cry of the cross is perennial. And we have to give hope to people where the hope, unborn, has died.”

The main reason people are upset with some of Wright’s comments, Smith added, is because he believes “America is in denial of the fragility of her humanity. America believes that she does not sin. America believes that she is saintly. Therefore, instead of saying, ‘God bless the world,’ we have to say, ‘God bless America.’”

Critics have also denounced Obama for not leaving Trinity, saying they would have walked out on any pastor who made such comments. Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson, once President Bush’s head speechwriter, asked in a March 19 column why, if Obama disagreed with Wright’s more controversial comments, he remained an active member and supporter of the church for two-plus decades.

“Obama’s excellent and important speech on race in America did little to address his strange tolerance for the anti-Americanism of his spiritual mentor,” Gerson wrote. “Barack Obama is not a man who hates—but he chose to walk with a man who does.”

But Obama said Wright is a more complex man—and Trinity a more complex congregation—than has been represented in the recent media uproar.

“I confess, if all that I knew of Rev. Wright were snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop” on TV news programs, and “if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures that have been peddled by some of the commentators, there is no doubt” that he would leave, he said.

But, Obama continued: “Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety. … The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and—yes—the bitterness and biases that make up the black experience in America. And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Rev. Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me.”

Leonard said that’s a common sentiment in churches—such as historically black ones—that place a strong emphasis on the value of a free pulpit.

“Jeremiah Wright won the right to talk straight with this people because he married them and buried them and was there when they were sick and hurting. And so, a great many people … because their preacher has been a pastor to them, are willing to let their pastor, in a free pulpit, let he, she say whatever … they feel led to.”

Bass and Leonard both said the Wright episode also shows that many in the mainstream news media still have a difficult time understanding Christianity in all its forms.

“In spite of all the religious conversation that has gone on, often growing out of the evangelical participation in the public square … the public media still, in general, does not know what to do with Christianity, left or right, with the rhetoric and the commitments and the contexts of Protestant preaching and culture,” Leonard said.

By comparison, Leonard noted, that two GOP presidential contenders this campaign cycle—former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and Arizona Sen. John McCain—had closely associated themselves with controversial San Antonio preacher John Hagee.

“Hagee is on television every day talking about the need to nuke Iran as a part of his view of biblical eschatology, and nobody has raised apparently any question about” Huckabee preaching at Hagee’s Cornerstone Church or McCain seeking, and getting, Hagee’s endorsement before the Texas primary, Leonard said.

“Jeremiah Wright didn’t want to nuke anybody. And so I think there’s a great deal of rhetoric, left and right, going on that grows out of context.”

Bass said that, while he was not trying to “establish an equivalence” between Wright’s comments and those of many conservative evangelicals, when taken out of context, evangelical preachers are often misunderstood by those outside their own context in the same fashion that Wright may have been interpreted.

“I think we all are, shall we say, victims of selective perception. We hear what we want to hear, we disregard what we don’t want to hear,” Bass said. “I think, after natural disasters (and) in anticipation of natural disasters, you’ve seen prominent conservative-oriented religious leaders speak of God’s judgment on parts of America or America as a whole. And I think there was outrage expressed (by politicians) without necessarily disengagement from their support for them or appreciation for them.”

Nonetheless, he added, Wright’s “statements themselves, out of context, do sound outrageous and do need to be rejected.”

Leonard said churches also need to be aware of how such comments could be perceived in the wider public in the YouTube age.

“Pulpit rhetoric in Protestant churches, left and right of center, in the context of most churches … sounds like prophetic conviction,” he said. However, “in light of American pluralism, when it gets on CNN, it sounds like bigotry. And religious communities have to understand that.”

He noted infamous comments from former Southern Baptist Convention President Bailey Smith. In 1980, the Oklahoma City-area pastor became the center of national controversy after declaring, at a highly publicized meeting, “God Almighty does not hear the prayer of a Jew.”

“How many times did Bailey Smith say that across Oklahoma, and he always got an ‘amen’” before getting criticized for it in a different context, Leonard asked. “That’s what religious communities have to know about sound-bite theology in the public square.”

To Alfred Smith, though, the criticism of Wright smarts very personally for him and other black preachers, because the African-American preaching tradition has, of necessity, been uniquely prophetic.

“My white peers who have gone to seminary and sat beside me in class go back to a church that requires them to preach a muzzled gospel—a domesticated gospel,” he said. “And I believe that Jeremiah Wright is a paradigm of the liberation pulpit, the prophetic African-American church—and it was not so much an attack on him as it was an attack on all of us.”




News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Bible Studies for Life Series for March 30: Living with passion for Jesus

Posted: 3/20/08

Bible Studies for Life Series for March 30

Living with passion for Jesus

• Revelation 1:9-13,17-18; 3:14-22

By Gary Long

Willow Meadows Baptist Church, Houston

I researched to verify this and cannot, but I think it was the great preacher John Claypool who said: “The opposite of love is not anger. It’s apathy.” That is to say, we get angry or passionate over the things we care about. If apathy aptly describes a relationship, then the relationship probably is in trouble.

That’s nearly the same sentiment at work in the focal verse for this week’s lesson, wherein the church at Laodicea is warned about being “lukewarm” in their faith. Jesus sent the angel to call on the First Baptist Church of Laodicea, and pastor Luke Warm opened the door. What followed was a tongue lashing for the church that would’ve surely embarrassed the members and brought shame upon them.

Jesus is sending a message to the church to shed their self-reliance and their sense of accomplishment based on wealth. It also is a message to take off the blinders and see them as they truly were—wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked. They were labeled lukewarm because they were not very passionate about their faith, and it was evidenced in their deeds.

That lukewarm metaphor meant a great deal to the people of Laodicea because their drinking water came via aquaduct over a great distance, and so by the time it got to Laodicea it was lukewarm. What’s more, the town was situated between Hierapolis, six miles to the north, and Colossae, 10 miles to the east. Hierapolis was known for its natural hot springs and Colossae got drinking water from the Lycus River, which was notably cold, according to Bible scholar Joseph Trafton.

In other words, Laodiceans would have gotten the double entendre about as clearly as a Texas Baptist hearing “potluck dinner” and knowing right away what to do. 

The point of this week’s lesson is simple: If you’re going to follow Jesus, do it with passion. Do it with zeal. Do it with energy.

But this message isn’t new to us, and it wasn’t new to the church of Laodicea. It’s not even new to the Jews who heard Jesus say, “You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind and strength.” 

Everything

The problem is not that we lack the ability, or even the desire. We lack the action it takes to be something other than lukewarm. So how can you help your learners see this gap between belief and practice of their faith? Here’s an illustration that you might share:

Just stick your head into any sports bar and you’ll see the evidence that fanaticism is alive and well in the course of human existence. It’s March now, and that means college basketball has fans at a fever pitch. As you deliver this lesson to your students they will likely be watching the second round of the annual three-week tournament dubbed “March Madness.”

This basketball extravaganza has grown men slipping out of the office to cheer like little kids for their favorite teams. It illustrates the fanaticism we are capable of exhibiting, but even an infection of “March Madness” doesn’t garner the kind of commitment Jesus is looking for.

See, rooting for a team is pretty easy. Even when they’re losing, it’s not all that hard. But saying “yes” to following Jesus isn’t as simple as cheering for the right team. It’s a matter of discipleship, commitment, service and study. It is a matter of prayer, reflection and discernment. And ultimately, our faith is useless unless it transforms on the “inside” in a way that shows in how we act on the “outside.”

Parker Palmer, in his wonderful little book Let Your Life Speak, describes what he calls the “Rosa Parks” decision. When asked why she refused to give up her seat to a white man according to the law, she answered simple, “I was tired.” Palmer suspects that while she was physically tired, she was also fatigued in another sense. He suggests her refusal to yield her seat was her saying she tired of living on the outside in a way that was incongruent with whom she was on the inside.

The church at Laodicea received a stern warning from Jesus because they knew better. On the “inside,” they knew what their deeds should be. But their actions did not reflect that belief on the outside. They knew of Jesus’ life, death and marvelous resurrection. They knew the message of the gospel that had been given to them, and they understood the great grace poured out on them. They just didn’t let that influence their deeds and were living in a way incongruent with their beliefs. 

As for us, the passion we see in Jesus is a passion which we should strive to imitate in our daily lives.  Followers of Jesus first earned the name “Christian” because were perceived by others as “little Christs.” When our passion mirrors the passion of Christ, we will be known as true disciples of Jesus. We can have right theology, we can have our Bible memorized, and we can be on every committee at church. But until we get those actions lined up, our unwillingness to live out our beliefs makes us equally lukewarm with those Laodiceans.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Explore the Bible Series for March 30: Renewing your commitment

Posted: 3/20/08

Explore the Bible Series for March 30

Renewing your commitment

• Genesis 34:30-31; 35:1-7, 9-15

By Donald Raney

First Baptist Church, Petersburg

The Bible is full of great stories. Some of these inspire us to stretch our faith while others teach us insights into the character of God or the nature of the Christian life. Still other Bible stories shock and perhaps even disgust modern readers and many wonder why such stories were included in the Bible.

The story of the defiling of Jacob’s daughter Dinah is one of those stories. More than a few readers have encountered this story and asked what purpose it could possible have. Yet while we may be at least initially offended by the events recorded, this story has much to teach about living out our spiritual commitments in the real world where horrible things take place. It teaches us that when life is settled, there is a danger of becoming lax in those commitments and drifting away from God unless we are continually watchful.

As we look at Jacob’s response to the events and the reaction of his sons, we see the need to regularly evaluate our spiritual commitments as well as the steps involved in renewing them.


Evaluate your actions (Genesis 34:30-31)

After his reunion with his brother Esau, Jacob purchased a plot of land near Shechem and settled into his new home. The son of his neighbor raped Jacob’s daughter Dinah and desired to marry her. When Dinah’s brothers Simeon and Levi learned of the attack, they formed a plan to get revenge. They lured the men of the town into an act apparently designed to create a bond with Jacob’s family and then killed all of them when they were most vulnerable.

When Jacob found out what they had done, he was very upset and told them their actions had created problems for the family. While Jacob likely understood their motivation, he questioned whether they had done what was best in handling the situation.

There are many times in everyone’s life when we react rather than respond to our circumstances. Something will be said or done which we take as a personal attack. Our initial reaction is to lash out against the one who offended us. Too often we follow this initial instinct and act to “make the wrong right.” Too often that reaction is the product of our human nature rather than our Christian walk.

Jacob teaches us that the first step in renewing our commitment to God is to carefully evaluate our actions and reactions and seek to do only those things in line with those commitments.


Purify yourself (Genesis 35:1-4)

The events in chapter 34 may have revealed a need for Jacob and his family to renew their commitments and relationship to God. Perhaps when life became settled, they had gradually lost sight of their need for God. God therefore told Jacob to take his family to Bethel and to build an altar there.

Yet before he could do this, Jacob knew they needed to remove all the false gods that had crept into their lives. Though they knew of their family’s close relationship with God, they had allowed pagan influences to become a part of their lives, likely accompanied by a variety of rationalizations. Before they could renew their commitment to God, these foreign deities had to be removed.

While few today have actual pagan idols, many have allowed sinful habits or attitudes to creep in. We often can even rationalize or justify these ungodly influences. These may include pursuing one’s own agenda or goals in one’s own way, a spirit of jealousy or unforgiveness, or some secret “pet sin.” Some may seek to draw closer to God without consciously addressing these issues and wonder why they do not hear God.

These verses clearly show us that if we desire to renew our commitment to God, we must acknowledge the presence of our “foreign gods” and purify ourselves by removing them from our lives.


Renew your devotion (Genesis 35:5-7)

Having heard God’s call and put away all foreign gods, Jacob and his family followed God’s lead to Bethel where Jacob immediately built an altar to God. Renewing one’s commitment to God involves more than a turning away from sinful influences. One also must turn toward God through refocusing devotion.

It is not insignificant that God lead Jacob to Bethel in order to renew his commitment. Bethel had been the site of God’s single greatest revelation to Jacob. It was at Bethel that Jacob had been given the vision of the heavenly staircase leading to God’s throne. God led Jacob away from the surroundings of his daily life and back to the place where God had first spoken to him.

It often is difficult to rededicate ourselves to God from the midst of our regular daily activities and routines. In that place, the same forces which had caused a decline in the level of our commitment can hinder our efforts to refocus on God. In our efforts to renew or commitment to God and his call on our lives, we may need to withdraw from daily life. While we need not physically return to the place where we first encountered God like Jacob, it often is helpful to consciously recall that experience and use that recollection to help us realign and renew our devotion to follow wherever God may lead.


Remember God’s promises (Genesis 35:9-15)

When Jacob and his family arrived in Bethel, Jacob quickly was reminded by God of the promises God had made to Abraham regarding the land and his posterity. Jacob was reminded of God’s giving him a new name and purpose. Jacob was called to multiply within the knowledge of these promises. Jacob then built a memorial that would help future generations recall God’s promises and renew their commitment to him.

God has granted to each of us many promises. Yet the busyness of life, or perhaps the sameness of every day life, can cause us to lose sight of them. As we periodically seek to renew our commitment to follow God, God will bring to mind his great promises. He will remind us that as believers we bear a new name which carries responsibilities with it. These reminders will help us to deepen and strengthen our recommitment to God.

As this happens, we should remember to build a memorial to God’s faithfulness. While it does not need to be a physical monument, it should be something specific which becomes a part of our story and legacy to remind ourselves and our posterity of the need to always maintain our commitment to follow wherever God leads.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




BRIEFS: Hymnal contents released

Posted: 3/20/08

BRIEFS: Hymnal contents released

New hymnal contents revealed. Titles of 674 hymns and worship songs included in the new Baptist Hymnal have been released by its publisher, LifeWay Christian Resources. “There is a good mix of hymns, worship music and praise choruses,” said Mike Harland, director of LifeWay Worship. “About 300 of these songs are new ones to our hymnal. Of these 300, about 200 have been published in other hymnals and about 100 are brand-new hymns and songs that haven’t been published in any hymnal before.” The full list of the songs is available at www.lifewayworship.com.

Schools’ group picks leader. The International Association of Baptist Colleges and Universities has elected Michael Arrington, provost of Carson-Newman College, as executive director. Arrington, 62, succeeds Thomas Corts, who in September was named by President Bush to coordinate education initiatives for the United States Agency for International Development. Arrington will retire as provost at Carson-Newman effective at the close of the academic year.

SBC preschool/children’s registration opens. Registration is open for families planning to enroll their children in June 8-11 preschool childcare or the children’s conference in conjunction with the Southern Baptist Convention’s annual meeting in Indianapolis, Ind. For all information regarding registration, visit www.sbc.net and click on “2008 SBC Annual Meeting” then “Children/Students.”

Ouachita dean nominated for CBF post. Hal Bass, a dean at Ouachita Baptist University, has been nominated for moderator-elect for the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship. Bass is a native of Corpus Christi who graduated from Baylor University and Vanderbilt University. He teaches political science and is dean of the school of social sciences at Ouachita. North Carolina pastor Jack Glasglow is the current moderator-elect. He will assume the office of moderator on June 20 at the conclusion of the CBF General Assembly in Memphis, Tenn. Harriet Harral of Fort Worth is the fellowship’s current moderator, and she will become chair of the nominating committee after the general assembly.




News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Theologian urges greater sensitivity to suicide

Posted: 3/20/08

Theologian urges greater sensitivity to suicide

By Greg Garrison

Religion News Service

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (RNS)—Churches can be a major factor in preventing suicide if they are willing to learn about the problem and reach out with compassion, said a theologian who specializes in pastoral care related to suicide.

“People who attend church have a lower suicide rate than people who don’t,” said Loren Townsend, a professor of pastoral ministry at Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary and author of Pastoral Care in Suicide. “Churches provide caring relationships that can help protect people from suicide.”

About 32,000 suicides occur each year in the country, a rate of about 11 per 100,000 people, according to the Suicide Prevention Action Network.

“Oftentimes times it’s a relational breakdown,” Townsend said. “They’re isolated in the world. Church relationships can provide a buffer for that.”

In the early Christian church, some ardent believers threw themselves off cliffs to demonstrate their devotion, Townsend said. The problem became so acute Augustine addressed the issue, equating self-killing and murder.

Later, theologian Thomas Aquinas wrote that since suicide victims could not ask for forgiveness, it was an unforgivable sin, Townsend said. “In our cultural thinking, there’s still an idea that it’s an unforgivable sin,” he said.

While churches have turned to a more compassionate view as more has become known about mental illness, there remain wrong stereotypes about suicide, Townsend said.

“There’s an idea Christians don’t do that,” Townsend said. “Christians are as vulnerable to mental health problems as anybody. Suicide almost always is a result of intense pain that doesn’t go away.”






News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Is Religious Right dead or part of new center?

Posted: 3/20/08

Is Religious Right dead
or part of new center?

By Robert Marus

Associated Baptist Press

WASHINGTON (ABP)—Reports the Religious Right’s demise have been greatly exaggerated, according to Tony Perkins and Harry Jackson.

But Jim Wallis, Samuel Rodriguez, David Gushee and other leaders and authors argue that the Religious Right, while not dead, is certainly suffering from a failure to thrive.

Both sides may be right.

Perkins and Jackson, both prominent Religious Right leaders, hosted a Washington discussion on their new book, Personal Faith, Public Policy. In the text, they argue the movement known as the Religious Right is not dead or dying but actually is expanding—despite recent media stories noting a new generation of evangelicals is increasingly weary of the culture-war rhetoric that is the movement’s hallmark.

“I feel amazingly well; I don’t feel like I’m cracking up or I’m dying,” said Perkins, president of the Family Research Council. “These headlines, like the paper that they’re written on, are recycled.”

Perkins and Jackson—a Washington-area pastor and key African-American supporter of President Bush in his successful 2000 and 2004 election campaigns—note in the book that the “liberal media” has at least twice in the past pronounced the Religious Right dead. The first was in 1989 after the death of the Moral Majority. The second was in the late 1990s after Congress failed in its impeachment efforts and the Christian Coalition’s influence began to wane.

Jackson said the fact that many younger evangelical leaders seem as concerned with global poverty and the environment as with abortion rights or sexuality simply shows the Religious Right is evolving. “Our movement is not dead; it’s maturing,” he claimed.

But Wallis and other Christian leaders say that, inasmuch as a broad evangelical political movement exists and is maturing, it is maturing beyond the causes and structures of the Religious Right.

“I am not one of those who say the Religious Right is dead or gone,” Wallis, head of the Sojourners/Call to Renewal anti-poverty movement, said during the discussion. “What I have said is what has felt like a monologue is over, and a dialogue has begun.”

The mainstream media finally is beginning to realize that not all self-described evangelicals are socially or economically conservative, white or obsessed with legalized abortion, gay rights and government endorsements of Christianity, Wallis said.

“I am pro-life as well. The question is: How does a consistent life-ethic apply? How deep and wide does it go?” he said. “To me, it includes the 33,000 children who will die today as a consequence of poverty and disease.”

Jackson and Perkins, in their book and in the discussion, acknowledged that the Religious Right has, in some cases, been too closely identified with the Republican Party—and that both may have suffered a loss of confidence from evangelicals, as evidenced by the number who voted for Democrats in the 2006 mid-term congressional elections.

“I think we saw in 2006 there was some hesitancy to challenge the Republicans in their long train of scandals that derailed their majority,” Perkins said. “I know that I was criticized for speaking out against some of the Republicans, for instance, (disgraced Florida congressman) Mark Foley, because there was concern that if we spoke out against them we would lose our majority.”

Some questioners noted that the Republican Party, in turn, was poised to nominate a presidential candidate—Sen. John McCain of Arizona—who has had a contentious relationship with the Religious Right.

But Perkins said conservative Christians are still exerting influence in the party.

“I think the fact that we have a McCain candidacy shows that evangelicals are strong, and it’s not a Rudy Giuliani candidacy,” he claimed, noting the collapse of the moderate former New York mayor’s GOP campaign. “Clearly, the Big Apple values were seen as being totally inappropriate to the core of the Republican Party.”

The fact that Jackson and Perkins have written their book is itself vindication of the idea that evangelical politics is changing, said David Gushee, a Mercer University professor who has written a new book hailing the emergence of what he calls the “evangelical center.”

At a separate March 11 panel discussion on Gushee’s book, The Future of Faith in American Politics, Gushee said Jackson and Perkins are offering a “reformist vision” of the conservative evangelical political movement that seems to have a lot in common with what leaders like Wallis and others are saying.

“It looks like the evangelical center is indeed arriving and that many are converging toward that center,” Gushee said.

Rich Cizik, chief public-policy officer for the National Association of Evangelicals, said the emergence of new evangelical politics will change the “us-versus-them” tone with which many conservative Christians have addressed those who disagree.

“It’s moving, you see, from a zero-sum-game politics where someone else has to lose for us to win, to a common-good vision of politics,” he said.

Cizik should know. He has drawn repeated fire from the Religious Right’s old-guard leaders for his outspokenness and willingness not to toe the traditional conservative line on issues such as global warming and torture.

“In transactional politics, you exchange goods, services, votes or whatever in return. And the evangelicals were in effect saying to the leaders of the Religious Right, ‘We’ll give you our support’” in voting for a party that seemed to embrace the values they found important, Cizik said. But more moderate and liberal Christians, as well as non-Christians, fought back.

But, he continued, “Transformational politics is very, very different.”

The Religious Right might not be changing its tone altogether, though. For example, Perkins’ book assails those who support gay rights or strong church state-separation as “anti-Christian” and contends media and political elites continue to harbor anti-Christian biases.

Nonetheless, Perkins’ willingness to invite Wallis to appear on the same panel with him may itself be the sign of new cooperation with groups his movement has often vilified.

“We do have some common ground with Jim Wallis and others that approach some of the same issues, but we approach them different,” Perkins admitted.

“This is an example of a new dialogue,” Wallis said.






News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




IRS scrutiny of Obama’s denomination may signal political-speech crackdown

Posted: 3/20/08

IRS scrutiny of Obama’s denomination
may signal political-speech crackdown

By Robert Marus

Associated Baptist Press

WASHINGTON (ABP)—What is the IRS thinking?

That’s the question that many church-state experts asked themselves when news broke in late February about the Internal Revenue Service’s investigation of Sen. Barack Obama’s denomination.

By all accounts, this is the first time the IRS has investigated a denomination. The agency is scrutinizing a speech that Obama—an active member of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago for more than two decades—gave at a denominational meeting last year.

Officials of the United Church of Christ announced they were under federal investigation for potential violations of tax law. Federal law prevents most churches and other tax-exempt groups organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the tax code from endorsing political candidates or parties.

But, after learning the details about the event, many experts in the area of political activity of churches have wondered why the IRS is investigating a denomination for a potential violation that is, at best, unclear. Some UCC supporters have even gone so far as to suggest the investigation may be politically motivated. The body is generally considered the most liberal major Protestant denomination in the United States.

Several church-state experts said they doubted the IRS would bow to political pressure in a church investigation. But the UCC case and other recent ones suggest the agency is cracking down on potential violations of the law during the 2008 campaign season.

“The one message that is clearest in this election cycle is that the IRS is taking its responsibility more seriously than ever to investigate this (or) any allegations of illegal political activity,” said Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. Lynn’s organization frequently files IRS complaints against churches and other religious organizations that appear to violate tax laws by involving themselves in partisan politics.

In a letter, IRS official Marsha Ramirez said “a reasonable belief exists” that the UCC violated the law with the Obama speech.

The agency’s concerns “are based on articles posted on several websites” that described Obama’s appearance at the denomination’s biennial General Synod meeting in Hartford, Conn., last summer, Ramirez continued. The senator—by then an announced Democratic candidate for president—spoke to about 10,000 church members, according to the denomination and news accounts.

But UCC officials said they took pains to ensure the speech was not perceived as a campaign event or an endorsement of the candidate.

Church officials invited Obama as a church member rather than in his capacity as a candidate and asked him to speak a year before he declared his intention to run for higher office, a UCC news release said. Obama was invited “as one of 60 diverse speakers representing the arts, media, academia, science, technology, business and government. Each was asked to reflect on the intersection of their faith and their respective vocations or fields of expertise.”

Prior to the speech, a church official told the crowd the appearance was not intended to be a campaign event and that campaign-related material and other forms of electioneering would not be allowed inside the event venue.

The IRS letter claimed that “40 Obama volunteers staffed campaign tables outside” the Hartford Civic Center, where the event was held. Church officials said they barred any campaigning inside the venue but could not prevent Obama’s campaign workers from setting up on the city street outside.

Obama’s speech, ironically, focused mainly on the proper intersection of faith and politics for Christians. At a few points in the oration, he lapsed into campaign-like language about policies he has advocated in the Senate—or would advocate in the White House—on moral issues such as health care. He also occasionally referred to his candidacy.

But, said a UCC attorney, the denomination shouldn’t be faulted for Obama’s occasional edging into campaign-like rhetoric.

“What the law requires is that the (tax-)exempt organization not engage in political activity,” said Don Clark, a Chicago lawyer who serves as the denomination’s national counsel. “The IRS has interpreted the law … that compliance would require restrictions not only on the behavior of the exempt organization, but on the behavior of the elected official. And so the issue that’s raised here is, if the organization controls its behavior, does everything that it can within its power, but the elected official does something … does the exempt organization, in effect, bear the brunt of the behavior of the elected official?”

The IRS conducts the vast majority of similar investigations into religious groups as responses to complaints filed with the agency’s regional field offices. The complaint that apparently spurred the IRS investigation, posted on a blog critical of the UCC’s leadership ( HYPERLINK "http://www.ucctruths.com" www.ucctruths.com), also mentions a denominational press release prior to the speech noting Obama was a presidential candidate who “has spoken often about his profession of faith, his membership in the socially progressive UCC and the need for Democrats to take seriously the concerns of religious Americans.”

But Lynn—who is an ordained minister in the UCC—said hanging the IRS case on that press release “is a pretty thin reed on which to base a claim that there’s something illegal being plotted when on the other side of the balance is just step after step to avoid this being given the appearance of a campaign appearance.”

Since the 2004 election, the IRS has conducted several prominent investigations of churches and leaders for political activity. In February, Wiley Drake of First Southern Baptist Church of Buena Park, Calif., announced he was under investigation for using church letterhead and a church radio show to endorse Mike Huckabee for the GOP presidential nomination.

Two large churches—one liberal, one conservative—were investigated for sermons delivered from their pulpits just prior to the 2004 presidential election between President Bush and Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry. Each sermon, critics said, while ostensibly about the candidates’ stances on certain moral issues, seemed calculated to recommend one over the other.

In the case of First Baptist Church of Springdale, Ark., the IRS dismissed the complaint Lynn’s organization had filed against it and its pastor, Ronnie Floyd.

But the agency extensively investigated All Saints Episcopal Church in Pasadena, Calif. In that case, the church’s former rector delivered a pre-election sermon that acknowledged both candidates were sincere Christians and that fellow believers could support either one in good conscience. However, the homily went on to denounce Bush’s Iraq war forcefully.

The agency closed the case against the congregation last fall. IRS officials told the church that, although the agency would impose no penalties on All Saints, it still believed the sermon had violated tax law.

All Saints’ legal tab for defending itself ran well into the six-figure range.

After the case closed, the church attempted to find out more about why it had been investigated. Through Freedom of Information Act requests, the congregation discovered coordination between the IRS and the Justice Department on the investigation at a stage that an attorney for All Saints described as “extraordinarily early” for an IRS probe.

“Normally, the Department of Justice becomes involved (in an IRS investigation) when a matter is headed to court,” said Marc Owens, a Washington-based tax attorney who represented the church.

But in All Saints’ case, “the coordination with the DOJ began virtually with the beginning of the examination phase,” Owens continued, referring to the second phase of an IRS inquiry. Judging from the documents they have received, the officials involved in coordinating between the agencies were career civil servants rather than political appointees, he said.

Lynn said such a consultation might have come up so early because of the sensitive legal nature of disputes between the government and churches.

“If I were a bureaucrat (for the IRS) and I found out that somebody was really fighting back and they were in any way discussing their free-speech rights, I’d be on the phone with the Justice Department sooner rather than later,” he said.

Nonetheless, he added, “it did strike me as unusual, but it may be unusual only because other people (under IRS investigation) haven’t filed those (freedom-of-information) requests” to find out more about their investigations.

Both Lynn and Owens said they doubted that such investigations are politically motivated.

“I resist the idea that there’s some kind of a crackdown or politicization of the Internal Revneue Service; I just don’t see any evidence of that,” Lynn said.

The Internal Revenue Service, which usually declines to discuss individual cases, did not respond to requests for comment from Associated Baptist Press. A Justice Department spokesman said his agency had no comment on the All Saints case.

Whatever the motivation for such aggressive investigations, Owens said, there are consequences for the churches under scrutiny.

“The issue there is whether there is some sort of attempt to chill (free) speech. And what we’re talking about is literally speech, and many times religious speech,” he said. “And the alacrity with which the IRS is moving is suggesting some sort of effort to head off further interactions.”




News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.