Posted: 9/17/04
Reorganization will help BGCT meet
Texas churches' needs, leaders agree
By Marv Knox
Editor
Reorganization of the Baptist General Convention of Texas is long overdue, BGCT leaders agree, but they predict the changes will enable the BGCT to improve its ability to meet the needs of Texas Baptist churches.
BGCT Executive Director Charles Wade, President Ken Hall and Chief Financial Officer David Nabors also stressed the proposed reorganization will increase accountability to the churches.
“For a long time, many Texas Baptists have felt that the Executive Board and the various boards and commissions, for all the good they have done, needed to be reorganized,” Wade explained.
He cited three primary reasons: “First, the present organization is confusing and difficult to explain.
“Second, members of the Executive Board often feel they have no input into developing policies, recommendations or initiatives. All of that is done by committees or other entities.
“And third, in a time of concern that boards of directors hold executive staff accountable, it is clear the 234 Executive Board members constitute too large a body to be fully engaged in evaluating and setting direction for the executive staff.”
Hall echoed the accountability theme.
“Governance has to match the convention's goals so you can force accountability,” he said. “You have to change the governance structure.”
To illustrate, he cited “too much duplication and confusion on our boards, commissions and committees.”
“And in this era of corporate scandal and poor board oversight in the for-profit and not-for-profit worlds, we've got to strengthen accountability,” he said. “We've been fortunate in Texas, because we've had godly people leading us.”
The proposed structure would do just that, Wade added.
“There will be more accountability for decisions made and actions taken,” he predicted. “The Executive Board will be asked to decide on matters which they have had a part in researching and developing. There will be better coordination and integration of ideas and solutions to help local churches, associations and institutions.”
And that accountability has ramifications throughout the convention structure, the leaders noted.
For example, the BGCT executive director currently relates to five major governing bodies in addition to the Executive Board, and they all have fiduciary responsibilities that overlap with the Executive Board, Hall said.
 |
| Charles Wade |
“The executive director now will have accountability to one group–the Executive Board, particularly through its Executive Committee,” Nabors explained.
Similarly, since the BGCT's institutions relate directly to coordinating boards and only indirectly to the Executive Board, “they never have had to be accountable to the Executive Board, even though the (BGCT) funding comes through there,” Hall noted, advocating a closer relationship between funding and accountability.
That will be accomplished through “a single line of accountability to a committee of the Executive Board,” Nabors responded.
Wade pledged the new structure will result in “a coordinated effort to assist the institutions in helping the churches be most effective in developing leaders, meeting human needs and other priorities of the convention.”
And the accountability will bounce back to the Executive Board as well, he observed.
“The Executive Board will have 90 members representing the entire state and the wonderful ethnic diversity we have in our churches,” he said. “They will be accountable for the work of the convention because they will be given the responsibility to develop the plans, policies and strategies that will affect all the work we will do together.”
Although the BGCT's institutions no longer will relate to coordinating boards, they will relate to the Executive Board's Institutional Relations Committee, Wade said.
“In fact, we hope we can better coordinate efforts and increase collaboration to encourage the institutions to help local churches be more effective,” he reported.
For example, integration of the work of institutions and commissions into the Executive Board's proposed committee structure will improve efficiency and effectiveness, he said.
 |
| David Nabors |
“The Executive Board will be involved in the evaluation of the work of the institutions and the missions, education and public policy matters,” he explained. “So, the board will be able to make better decisions about allocating resources through the budget and personnel assignments.”
And the new structure will not erode the strength of the Christian Life Commission, which has “spoken to and not for” Texas Baptists on moral concerns for more than five decades, Wade added. “We will not lose the prophetic voice on ethical and moral issues which the CLC provides. We will improve our ability to educate our churches and people regarding biblical ethics.”
Advisory groups will strengthen the impact of ministries previously represented by coordinating boards and commissions, he noted, stating these groups will “serve as resources and advocates for our missions and ministry efforts.”
Although each of the BGCT's 113 affiliated district associations no longer will be represented on the Executive Board, representation will be fair and equitable, Nabors and Wade promised.
“Resident membership of our churches is a better representative baseline measure of Texas Baptists,” Nabors said.
“There will be three Executive Board members for every 50,000 resident members of our Baptist churches across Texas, This is the fairest way to represent our people and our churches,” Wade added. “Although every association will not always have at least one Executive Board member, we will be working so hard to relate to the churches and associations across Texas that they are going to feel better represented and better served than ever before.”
Moreover, the new Executive Board's membership “will be a more accurate representation of our true makeup” than the current board's roster, Nabors added.
“We will implement overlays of ethnic, gender, clergy, laity and other appropriate measures to be sure we have a fair representation of our churches' membership. These measures will be updated periodically to assure consistency in that representation.”
That diversity will be evident in about a year, when the first roster of Executive Board members is presented to the convention at the time of the final constitutional vote, which would make the reorganization official, Wade said.
“Everyone will be able to see before the final vote that we have achieved a broad-based representation of all our Baptist people,” he said.
The reorganization is vital for the BGCT's future, the convention leaders stressed.
“These changes will make our convention more accountable to the churches,” Wade noted. “The changes will make the convention staff more helpful to our churches, associations and institutions, and more focused on encouraging, facilitating and connecting our churches in their work to fulfill God's mission of reconciling the world to himself.”
“We are not the convention we were 50 years or 20 years ago,” Nabors said. “In order to be viable and helpful to our churches, we must change to reflect who we are today and who we need to be tomorrow.”
“The challenge we face in the BGCT is not from those who oppose us,” Wade said. “Our challenge is to be useful and enthusiastic partners with the Holy Spirit and the churches so that people everywhere will get a chance to know how much God loves them.
“We must focus on what God has called us to do if we hope to engage and energize young Baptists across this state in doing the work God has given us all to do.”
The proposed changes will create a strong Executive Board that can guide a strong state convention, Hall added.
“There should be one group of people who looks at the whole picture of what Texas Baptists want to do and holds agencies and leadership accountable,” he said.
Hall praised the proposals for enabling the BGCT to meet the needs of the times.
“In this day, organizational governance must be lean and adaptable to the ever-changing nature of the world,” he explained. “This streamlined governance model enables Texas Baptists to be more flexible and have less denominational bureaucracy, and therefore we are able to respond to needs and opportunities more quickly.”
The reorganization is not simply change for the sake of change, Wade added.
“It grows out of our desire to be more accountable to the churches for the decisions and proposals that will arise in the future,” he said. “We believe it will be more effective and will generate more appreciation and confidence among our Baptist people as we move forward.
“Equally important to me are the proposed mission, vision, values and priority statements,” which also were proposed by the convention's strategic planning committee.
“These will shape our core strategies and then the operational decisions that will put our staff in the most strategic places with the most strategic assignments to help us encourage, facilitate and connect the churches in their work.”
That's a new vision, “a refocusing on the needs of the churches,” Nabors said.
And fulfillment of the new vision is up to Texas Baptists, Hall added: “The outcome is dependent upon our faithfulness and stewardship of ministry. I'm committed personally to do everything I can to make it happen.”
News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Texas Baptist churches, in the BGCT, the Southern Baptist Convention ( SBC ) and around the world.