Posted: 4/11/08
Texas Baptist Forum
Creationism
We were stunned to see a prominent photo of our president, Ken Ham, standing next to the dinosaur exhibit inside our new Creation Museum accompanying your story on religious fundamentalists and their alleged anti-modernism (March 31).
• Jump to online-only letters below |
|
Letters are welcomed. Send them to marvknox@baptiststandard.com; 250 words maximum. |
 “As easy as it is for those of us who are white to look back and say, ‘That’s a terrible statement,’ I grew up in a very segregated South, and I think you have to cut some slack. And I’m going to be probably the only conservative in America who’s going to say something like this, but I’m just telling you, we’ve got to cut some slack to people who grew up being called names, being told: ‘You have to sit in the balcony when you go to the movie. You have to go to the back door to go into the restaurant. And you can’t sit out there with everyone else. There’s a separate waiting room in the doctor’s office. Here’s where you sit on the bus.’ And you know what? Sometimes people do have a chip on their shoulder and resentment. And you have to just say: ‘I probably would too. I probably would too. In fact, I may have had … more of a chip on my shoulder had it been me.’” Mike Huckabee Former presidential candidate, governor and Baptist pastor, on the preaching of Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama’s former pastor (MSNBC) |
Neither Ham nor the museum was actually mentioned in the article, which suggests that one of your editors made an ill-informed decision in the photo selection. It shows an ignorance of our ministry and its methods.
First, Answers in Genesis does believe in scientific inquiry. That is why we employ staff with doctorate degrees in astronomy, geology, medicine and biology. Also, contrary to what was implied, our identity is not defined by what we oppose; it’s defined by our adherence to proclaiming the positive message that the Bible is true.
In addition, we are not afraid of opposing points of view. Our new museum presents the arguments for evolution, and then rebuts them. Further, we have never been involved in any political causes. We don’t even push for creation to be taught in public schools.
Finally, our museum features state-of-the-art exhibits, yet by implication we are caricatured as “anti-modern.” Perhaps you can see why we rubbed our eyes when we saw ourselves being depicted as Exhibit A of backward thinking.
And since when is believing in the Bible a bad thing in Baptist circles?
Mark Looy, CCO
Answers in Genesis/Creation Museum
Petersburg, Ky.
I wanted to comment that comparing peaceful, thoughtful Christian groups such as Answers in Genesis with insanely violent cults such as al-Quaeda is borderline criminal. There is no comparison. I am glad the AiG photo has been removed from your website, since it is not applicable.
One of the issues in the world—and AiG points this out—is that in certain areas mortal mankind cannot know or prove what is truth. This is the case even for concepts that so-called “progressive” humanist fundamentalists believe, such as the dogmas of evolution and that the universe is billions of years old. These are hypotheses that have not been and cannot be proven.
Since no one, not even “science,” can prove everything, everyone has some belief system based on faith—faith in God, faith that there is no God, etc.
To each person, his belief system is absolute truth. Thus, everyone potentially is a fundamentalist, because everyone has a belief system. The real problem is when violent, unlawful actions are taken.
However, ultimately, there is one and only one Truth. All the other belief systems are not true. That’s not fundamentalism. It is fact.
Bill Boger
Scottsdale, Ariz.
The article on fundamentalists had some vital and accurate information, but why the picture of Ken Ham and the Creation Museum?
Personally, I know nothing of this museum, and there was no mention of this issue in the article at all. It seems to insinuate and imply that anyone who believes in and promotes Creationism or Intelligent Design has to be considered a fundamentalist. Many who do not consider themselves part of the fundamentalist camp or agree with their tactics believe strongly in Creationism.
This is highly inappropriate and misleading journalism.
Larry Venable
Garland
I am so saddened whenever I see Christians deny the magnificence of God and going to all lengths to explain “creation.”
“Evolution!” Just go outside and yell, “Evolution!”
See, Christians can say the word. The sky didn’t fall; Christ didn’t return.
God made dinosaurs. He made the cosmos. And he didn’t do it in 24/7. It evolved. We evolved. God is not lying to us in the marvels in our earth, or when we turn our eyes to the heavens. He did not set up some great scheme just to confuse us. He allows us a glimpse of his magnificent creation when we scour the earth, read the bones and see the footprints of dinosaurs at Glen Rose.
What other generation could appreciate what we see? Other peoples down through the ages had no idea what these things meant. God has privileged us with this awesome discovery. Isaac Newton would be honored to have this knowledge—and we discard it.
We send our kids to private schools where “evolution” is a dirty word. Christians are afraid this will negate the Bible. How ridiculous. God doesn’t need our belief in a seven-day creation.
If we want to leave our Christian beliefs to our children, we must give them a bigger God. A God big enough to have created untold galaxies, to have been here before the dinosaurs, and old enough for their eternity.
Shirley Taylor
Willis
Wright’s sermons
I have not always been proud of every member of my race, which is white. But I have always been proud to be an American.
I am 83 years old. In elementary school, I learned about Nathan Hale, Benedict Arnold, Patrick Henry, John Paul Jones, Betsy Ross, George Washington and many more Americans, both good and bad. When I was a junior in high school, Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese. My fellow students and I could hardly wait to finish school and give this nation from three years up to our entire lives in brutal and terrifying places far away from home.
When I heard Jeremiah Wright “damning” the United States, I didn’t think of his color; I thought of his allegiance. Your phlethora of articles seemed intended to lecture your readers on clinging to racial prejudice, but not one word was said about Pastor Wright’s treasonous diatribe against our country (March 31).
So the things he said from the pulpit are OK because they belong to the black prophetic heritage? What book of the Bible is that phrase in?
I don’t see skin color when I look at a person, but I know treason when I hear it.
William B. Crittenden
Houston
I certainly would not have used the fiery rhetoric Jeremiah Wright used in criticizing America from his pulpit. But I have to admit I agree with some of the criticisms he expressed.
For starters, God must be very displeased with how America treated Native-American Indians and enslaved Africans via an evil institution called slavery. And during my lifetime, it was America’s toleration of segregation, Jim Crow, the precedent-setting dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and currently the unwise invasion and occupation of Iraq.
If the Old Testament prophets were alive today and living in America, I believe they would be persons of hope who would deliver some harsh criticisms of our country. As individuals and as a nation, in a cause-and-effect way, we pay for our sins and the sins of our ancestors.
Prophets who speak truth to power are unpopular and often say things we don’t want to hear. Martin Luther King Jr. was a modern-day prophet who told it like it was in a spirit of love, knowing all along that what he said and did would probably cost him his life.
Despite our many glib “God Bless America” pleas, America’s past and current national sins keep her from earning a God’s most-favored-nation status.
Paul L. Whiteley Sr.
Louisville, Ky.
Fundamentalism
Rob Sellers’ flexible definition of fundamentalism as being “a defense of the faith … against whatever is perceived to be a threat or a challenge, or whatever is judged to be heretical or liberal” is sorely lacking (March 31).
The book of Acts chronicles the apostolic preaching of the truth that confronted accepted patterns of worship, both Jewish and pagan. Once established, however, the Apostle Paul repeatedly tells Timothy and Titus to defend the faith, stand firm and resist false doctrine.
Fundamentalism’s flaw is not its defense of truth, but the lack of love by which it accomplishes its means. We are to “boldly persuade people concerning the kingdom of God” (Acts 19:8), but do so “serving the Lord with humility and tears,” not arrogant militancy (Acts 20:19). To “not shrink back from declaring the whole purpose of God” (Acts 20:27), but to “speak the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15). To be “ambassadors for Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:20), but to “keep (our) behavior excellent among the Gentiles” (1 Peter 2:12).
We are to be Christ’s loving truth tellers. To avoid our duty to challenge falsehood, whether “heretical or liberal” is to bring guilt upon ourselves (see Acts 20:26, Ezekiel 3:17-19). I am against fundamentalism because of their arrogant and spiteful attitudes as the owners of truth, when in fact, if they are Christ’s, truth owns them!
Ben Macklin
Vernon
What do you think? Send letters to Editor Marv Knox by mail: P.O. Box 660267, Dallas 75266-0267; or by e-mail: marvknox@baptiststandard.com.
News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.