WASHINGTON (RNS)—U.S. Catholic voters are split on the issues of abortion and same-sex marriage between those who attend church at least twice a month and those who attend church less often, according to a new survey by the Knights of Columbus.

The survey found that Catholics—73 percent—and non-Catholics—71 percent agreed America needs a “moral makeover.”

Nonpracticing Catholics—defined as those who attend church less than twice a month—were more likely to support abortion rights and same-sex marriage than the American population at large.

“Catholics should not be viewed as undifferentiated,” said Carl Anderson, head of the Knights of Columbus. He said labeling Catholics as a monolithic voting block ignores the disparity between practicing Catholics, who lean more conservative, and nonpracticing Catholics, who tend to be more liberal.

Seventy-five percent of practicing Catholics oppose same-sex marriage, compared to 54 percent of nonpracticing Catholics. Sixty-five percent of nonpracticing Catholics identified themselves as “pro-choice” on abortion, compared to 36 percent of practicing Catholics.

The survey revealed 76 percent of pro-choice nonpracticing Catholics said abortion should be significantly restricted. Anderson said the pro-choice label “needlessly polarizes the discussion of abortion.”

“The term ‘pro-choice’ is obsolete,” he said.

The survey focused on the issues of abortion and same-sex marriage because they are “fundamental values that resonate more strongly among Catholics,” Anderson said. Still, the economy ranked as the top issue, with 60 percent of practicing Catholics saying the financial situation is the most critical issue facing the country.

“It’s an issue of the moment,” Anderson said, but even the financial crisis is a reflection of the nation’s “crisis of character,” he added.

The survey of 1,733 American adults was conducted by the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion. The margin of error for the overall survey was plus or minus 2.5 percentage points, and varied for individual subgroups, including up to plus or minus 6 percentage points for nonpracticing Catholics.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (ABP)—“Values voters”—a term popularized by conservative evangelicals after the 2004 elections—may bring a wide array of values to the polls. Here’s a rundown of the two presidential candidates’ views on a number of issues cited by religiously motivated voters on both the left and right, as compiled by the website OnTheIssues.org :

• Abortion. John McCain supports overturning Roe v. Wade— the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide—with exceptions for incest and rape. He would prohibit late-term abortion procedures labeled by opponents as “partial-birth” abortion and ban public funding of organizations that advocate or perform abortions. He would prosecute abortion doctors, not the women who get them.

Barack Obama supports Roe v. Wade. He believes common ground can be found by acknowledging there is a moral dimension to the abortion debate and that people of good will are on both sides. He says everyone can agree on working to avoid unwanted pregnancies that might lead someone to consider an abortion.

• Capital punishment. McCain supports broadened use of the death penalty, stricter penalties for violent crime and increasing spending to build more federal prisons.

While supporting capital punishment for some heinous crimes, Obama says the death penalty should be enforced fairly and with caution.

• Gay marriage. Obama opposes same-sex marriage but supports civil unions for gay couples. He says decisions about same-sex marriage should be left up to the states but opposes California’s Proposition 8, which defines marriage as between a man and woman.

McCain supports Proposition 8 and has supported a statewide ban on gay marriage in his home state of Arizona, but he opposes a similar ban on the federal level, saying it should be left up to individual states.

• Global warming. McCain says climate change is real and must be addressed, and nuclear power is the best way to fix it. He also supports alternative fuels like wind, tide, solar, natural gas and clean-coal technology and favors offshore drilling to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil.

Obama favors nuclear power as one component of the nation’s overall energy mix. He says 20 percent of the nation’s power supply should come from renewable sources by 2020. He believes the Book of Genesis teaches stewardship of the earth and sacrifice on behalf of future generations.

• Health care. Obama says health care is a right for every American, and it is morally wrong when the terminally ill must worry about paying their medical bills. He says he would take on insurance companies to drive down health care costs and provide mandatory health care for children.

Sen. Barack Obama

McCain says health care is a responsibility. He says affordable health care should be available to every citizen, but families, rather than the government, should make decisions about health care.

• Immigration. McCain says he would restart comprehensive immigration reform only after securing America’s borders. He would deport 2 million people in the country illegally who have committed crimes and says he would veto any bill giving amnesty to illegal immigrants.

Obama says America has nothing to fear from today’s immigrants. He supports immigration reform that secures America’s borders, punishes employers who exploit migrant workers and requires the 12 million undocumented immigrants to take steps to become legal citizens.

• Iraq. Obama opposed the war in Iraq from its beginning and says it has distracted the United States from catching Osama bin Laden.

McCain believes in the Bush policy of pre-emptive war. He credits President Bush and the troops for the fact there has not been another major terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11. McCain says America is winning in Iraq. He views “radical Islam” as the greatest challenge facing the 21st century.

• Israel. Both candidates support a two-state solution of Israel and Palestine living side-by-side in peace.

McCain wants to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem to show solidarity with Israel. Obama says Jerusalem should be a final-status issue resolved between the Palestinians and the Israelis.

• Labor. Obama says workers should have the freedom to choose whether to join a union without harassment or intimidation. He says farm policy should benefit families, not corporations. He supports making the minimum wage a living wage and says customers having to pay more for consumer items produced domestically is worth it to keep jobs in the United States.

McCain says Americans are not afraid of foreign competition and supports lowering barriers to free trade.

• Race. McCain voted against the federal holiday for Martin Luther King in 1990 but now says it was a mistake. He defended the Confederate flag as a “symbol of heritage” but said South Carolina was wise to fly the flag in front of instead of on top of the state house.

Obama says the Confederate flag belongs in a museum, not on public property.

• Schools. McCain says the key to improving the quality of public schools is to promote competition from charters, homeschooling and vouchers for private schools.

Obama supports charter schools but opposes vouchers.

McCain believes virtues contained in the Ten Commandments should be taught in public schools and that school prayer should be allowed but not mandated. Obama supports a stricter separation between church and state.

McCain says whether creationism should be taught alongside evolution is up to local school districts. He says he believes in evolution but sees the hand of God in creation. Obama opposes teaching creationism in public schools.

• Stem-cell research. Obama says America owes it to her citizens to explore the potential of embryonic stem cells to treat debilitating diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, spinal cord injuries and diabetes.

McCain also supports expanding federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

• Torture. McCain disagrees with the White House position that waterboarding is not torture and says torture is supported only by people without military experience.

Obama says torture should not be used under any circumstance.

WASHINGTON (RNS)—Distortions, stretches, half-truths and omissions are familiar features of political campaigns. But independent fact-checkers and analysts say outright falsehoods in candidates’ ads may be reaching a level not seen since TV commercials entered presidential politics more than a half-century ago.

It is happening, they say, because false advertising has worked; because there are few, if any, penalties for it; and because truth becomes a relative and disputable term in the alternate reality of partisan politics—or as George Costanza once said on Seinfeld,“It’s not a lie if you believe it.”

“They’re drinking their own Kool-Aid,” said Brooks Jackson, director of the nonpartisan FactCheck.org at the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center. “I’ve come to believe that an awful lot of the time they believe the ads. They’ve convinced themselves.”

Political scientist Darrell West examined past patterns in his book Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns. The most dubious and misleading ads generally have come from groups independent of candidates, such as those who made the “Swift Boat” ads against John Kerry in 2004, he noted.

“This year, the candidates themselves have really pushed the envelope,” West said. “The 2008 campaign has reached all-time lows in the use of misleading and inaccurate political appeals. Even Karl Rove, the architect of negative ads in previous campaigns, has complained about the tenor of this year’s campaign. When Karl Rove says that, you probably ought to pay attention.”

Sen. Barack Obama has been cited for ads that quoted Sen. John McCain out of context to say he would support “100 years” of war in Iraq or that said McCain would slash Social Security benefits.

Obama’s campaign also aired a higher percentage of negative ads than McCain’s—77 percent to 56 percent—in the first wave of advertising after the conventions, according to a study by the University of Wisconsin Advertising Project.

Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain addresses supporters at a campaign rally. (PHOTO/Newhouse News Service/Kimberlee Hewitt)

But negative is not necessarily untruthful. PolitiFact.com, a project of Congressional Quar-terly and the St. Petersburg Times, rated 47 McCain ads and statements from “barely true” to “pants-on-fire” false, compared with 30 for Obama. McCain had six ads in the “pants-on-fire” category. Obama had one.

“McCain is the one who has had the bigger problem in terms of factual accuracy,” West said. The Republican, he added, was the one coming up in the polls until the crisis in financial markets started last month.

Two McCain ads drew particular notice from fact-checkers. One said Obama’s “one accomplishment” was “legislation to teach comprehensive sex education to kindergartners”—misrepresenting his support for teaching them about inappropriate touching by adults, and understating his record.

The other said a “disrespectful” Obama compared Sarah Palin to a pig. Actually, he was talking about McCain’s claim to be a force for change when he said, “You can put lipstick on a pig, it’s still a pig”—using an expression McCain once applied to Hillary Clinton’s health-care plan.

McCain ads have said falsely that Obama would raise taxes on the middle class, when in fact he would exempt families earning less than $250,000 from higher taxes, and that Palin did not seek earmarks as governor of Alaska.

The Washington Post said in a front-page story that after becoming fed up about claims that Palin said “thanks but no thanks” to the Bridge to Nowhere, the Obama campaign broke a taboo and used the “L-word of politics to say that the McCain campaign was lying.”

'Lying' a word you don't hear 

Lying, however, is a word “you don’t hear” from independent analysts, Jackson said. “A lie is an intentional deception. Unless you’re a mind reader, it’s very difficult to prove the intent of anybody.”

Whatever the intent or term, false and negative ads often work very well, said Carolyn Lin, a communications professor at the University of Connecticut. “When it works, it works like a charm, and historically it has worked. That’s why they do it.

“The unfortunate thing about political advertising is that when you tell lies, these lies often stick, and the liars never receive any penalties.”

Studies have shown that debunking falsehoods can have the backfire effect of reinforcing falsehoods by repeating them.

Screening out the facts 

People screen out facts that run counter to broad narratives they accept, and they perceive reality in a way that conforms to their long-held beliefs, said science writer Farhad Manjoo, who writes about the phenomenon in his book, True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society.

By rebutting untruths, meanwhile, a candidate departs from his own message and can risk being seen as weak or complaining.

Legally, candidates have a right to lie to voters just about as much as they want, said FactCheck.org’s Jackson.

The Federal Communica-tions Commission requires broadcasters to run ads uncensored, even if the broadcasters believe they are false. And the Federal Election Commission deals with finances, not ads.

“Ohio has the toughest truth-in-political-advertising law in the nation. And it doesn’t work,” Jackson said. “There’s no fines, no enforcement mechanism.”

Tom Feran writes for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland.

HARTSELLE, Ala. (RNS)—About a year ago, Randall Brown started looking for a safe place for kids to hang out—online, that is.

He found out the hard way that MySpace isn’t just for finding friends, networking or listening to cool bands. Companies have hacked into MySpace and spam-slammed it with porn ads and advertisements.

He also looked at Facebook, and although that site has had better luck filtering out porn and advertisements, there are still teenagers being teenagers, posting comments, pictures, graphics and other applications that might be offensive.

So, Brown, 28, of Hartselle, Ala., and friend Michael Smith, 29, of Hatton, Ala., decided to come up with something different—www.christianspaceonline.com.

What makes it different? Christianspaceonline automatically filters out bad language and warns offensive members of improper comments, pictures or graphics. The two men wanted to find a safe space online not only for everyone from teenagers to adults, but also eventually for their kids. Brown has three children, 10, 4 and 2; Smith’s are 6, 4 and a newborn.

“That’s where the thought process came from,” Brown said. “I was getting bombarded with solicitations from different things—pornography, dating sites, that kind of thing.

“You want it to be a safe place, but companies out there hire people to look for websites to solicit. We’ve had it on ours. Here’s the good thing: If you reported things on MySpace, you never heard anything on it. If you report it on ours, it comes to us, and we can delete it and block the IP address.”

The website went public last November. After a slow start, christianspaceonline soon had 996 members—four off the goal of 1,000.

At one point, after getting some exposure at concerts and other events, the site was getting 100 new members a day, and that’s quite a challenge, especially since both Brown and Smith work during the day and lead a weekly ministry. Still, the two men think it’s worth all the hard work.

Randall Brown (center) and Michael Smith (right) discuss their social networking site, Christianspaceonline.com, with Christian radio DJ Jon Walden at WDJC in Birmingham, Ala. (RNS photo/Courtesy of Randall Brown)

“You can go on and look at our blogs,” Brown said. “We had one girl who said: ‘I just accepted Christ and things go on in life that make me question my decision. Because I’m a believer of Christ, why do bad things happen?’”

Brown saw it as an opportunity to minister.

“I sent her an e-mail that said, ‘Just because bad things happen doesn’t mean God isn’t on your side,’” Brown said. “We have pastors who reach out to us and are 100 percent behind it. If there’s a situation where they need to be involved, they will help.”

Of course, there always will be those who push the boundaries of even a Christian site.

“Yeah, we have people who test our language filters,” Brown said. “If you put a curse word on the comments, unless they manipulate the word, we can block it. The good thing about our site is that when it’s reported, we’re right on the spot and can go in and delete the comment. We can do the same thing with pictures.”

If a guy puts up a picture of himself at the beach with no shirt, it’s pulled, Brown said. If a girl puts up one in a bathing suit, it’s pulled. He recalls a mother who was bothered when her 13-year-old son was contacted by a 19-year-old man from Tennessee. The mother couldn’t cite anything offensive, but was uncomfortable, so Brown contacted the 19-year-old and suggested he talk to people more his age.

“We’re never going to be 100 percent perfect, but it’s better than the alternatives,” Brown said. “There’s no guaranteed safety at church or school. We try to keep it as clean as possible.”

Both men say they’re not in the venture to make money, but investors and T-shirt sales help keep the site going. A lot of older adults also enjoy surfing the site.

“You’d be amazed,” Brown said. “We have a lot of 30- to 50-year-olds and a lot in their 70s.”

WASHINGTON (RNS)—Megachurches known for big buildings, big schools and big crowds continue to grow. But a new study detects shifts in the way they are expanding.

“The general growth pattern is that about 90 percent of mega-churches report that they are growing, and many of them at very fast rates,” said Warren Bird, a researcher at the Leadership Network, a Dallas-based church think-tank, and co-author of the study.

The average megachurch saw a growth of about 50 percent in attendance in the last five years; about 10 percent reported a decline or stagnation.

The expansion of many of the nation’s estimated 1,250 mega-churches is occurring through satellite campuses, and they are shifting their training emphasis by running fewer schools and more pastors’ conferences.

“You have a tremendous amount of growth but not … larger and larger buildings,” said study co-author Scott Thumma, a sociologist of religion at Hartford Seminary.

The churches, with worship attendance of 2,000 or more each weekend, increasingly are using satellite locations, with 37 percent using them in 2008, compared to 27 percent in 2005 and 22 percent in 2000.

The researchers found on average, megachurches surveyed this year had offered four services at each of two satellite locations each weekend.

Five percent of megachurches had six or more locations, where between one dozen and two dozen services occur each weekend.

Almost a third of the mega-churches surveyed—30 percent—said they had started using satellite campuses in the last five years.

Outreach magazine, a church leadership publication based in Vista, Calif., reports that for the first time, all the congregations on its list of 100 largest churches in the United States are attended by more than 7,000 people. It notes that experts predict half of all mega-churches will have multiple locations by 2010.

But as they continue to grow, fewer megachurches are involved in TV and radio ministry. The percentage of megachurches with a radio ministry dropped from 44 percent in 2000 to 24 percent in 2008. Likewise, the percentage with television ministries dropped from 38 percent to 23 percent.

Fewer also are operating Christian schools. In 2000, 42 percent of megachurches surveyed said a Christian elementary or secondary school was part of their ministry. This year, that figured dropped to 25 percent. The percentage with an affiliated Bible school or institute dropped from 30 percent in 2000 to 20 percent in 2008.

At the same time, more churches are offering conferences for pastors or other ministry leaders, increasing from 47 percent in 2000 to 54 percent in 2008.

Even though the majority of megachurches are affiliated with denominations, researchers said offering conferences, resources and mission opportunities suggests the rise of “mini-denominations.”

“They are creating alternative ways for churches and for religious people to get resources, to do ministry, to do missions, to connect with other churches,” said Thumma, author of Beyond Megachurch Myths.

“All the things that were typically done … from the national denominational structure are being done at a local-church level.”

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dined with 300 religious and political leaders in New York, but the controversial event offered far less dialogue than advertised. Ahmadinejad delivered a 45-minute address that cut short any possibility of question-and-answer. The dinner met heavy criticism from the Anti-Defamation League and conservative Christian groups such as the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, who said the Iranian leader was not an honest broker for peace. Leaders of the historic peace churches that helped organize the dinner—including Quakers and Mennonites—rebuffed the criticism, saying Jesus was condemned for dining with sinners in his day.

Muslims allow guide dogs in British mosques. British Muslim authorities have issued a fatwa—a religious edict—that allows guide dogs to enter mosques, even though Islam traditionally teaches that dogs are unclean animals. The ruling by the Islamic Sharia Council stipulates, however, that dogs are not allowed into the prayer room and should be left in a foyer or anteroom. The ruling arose from a request by Mohammed Abraar Khatri, an 18-year-old blind student from Leicester. At the Bilal Jamia mosque where Khatri worships, a special rest area has been set up in the entrance to accommodate his guide dog, Vargo, while he is praying.

Muslim files complaint over handling alcohol. A Muslim worker has launched legal action against Britain’s largest supermarket chain because his warehouse job required him to lift cartons of alcoholic drinks, which he said violates his religious beliefs. Muhammed Ahmed told an employment tribunal in Birmingham, England, he was treated unfairly when his employers at Tesco put him to work loading alcoholic beverages on fork-lift trucks. The dispute mirrors similar fights in the United States, where Muslim cashiers at Target objected to handling pork products—which Islam deems unclean—and taxi drivers at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport refused to accept passengers returning from trips with alcohol.

Students suspended for hanging Obama effigy. Four students were suspended from George Fox University after they confessed to hanging a life-size cardboard cutout of Sen. Barack Obama on the Newberg, Ore., campus. A custodial crew at the school, founded by Quaker pioneers in 1891, discovered the Obama likeness hanging by fishing wire from a tree early one morning and tore it down before students arrived for classes. A sign taped to the cutout said, “Act Six reject,” referring to a scholarship program that has brought minority and low-income students from Portland to the school. The four students who confessed to the offense were suspended up to one year, school officials announced. Other sanctions include community service and multicultural education, which must be completed before the students can return to campus, said Brad Lau, vice president of student life. The FBI is investigating possible civil rights violations.

DALLAS (ABP)—Social-networking sites like Facebook and MySpace are redefining the way many Americans build and maintain relationships—and also how their churches communicate.

In the last few years, relating to social contacts through such sites has become practically ubiquitous among the under-30 crowd, and the practice quickly is spreading upward along the demographic spectrum.

Simultaneously, Christian leaders are realizing the sites can be useful tools, particularly for youth ministry and college groups, enabling group members to reach each other consistently and instantaneously.

That’s because social-networking sites are the new coffeehouses and community centers of the Internet. They are places where people can stay connected—in some cases, practically constantly—with what is going on in the lives of their friends, family and colleagues.

People use their online profile pages to post pictures, send messages, create events and invite people to them, and provide status updates to show what is going on in their lives.

Dale Tadlock, the 41-year-old associate pastor at First Baptist Church of Waynes-boro, Va., has been in student ministry 20 years. He stays linked with his students using Facebook.

He even does visitation through the site. When newcomers fill out visitors’ cards at his youth group meetings, many mark “Facebook” as the best way to contact them.

While on the go, Tadlock uses the Internet feature of his “smart phone” mobile device to check Facebook to find out his students’ latest status. Their profiles reveal current activities, pictures they’ve added and other Facebook users with whom they’ve had recent contact.

Tadlock said his colleagues nationwide are using such sites similarly in ministry, although some do so more extensively than others.

Customized add-on for Facebook 

Tim Schmoyer, youth pastor at the Evangelical Covenant Church of Alexandria, Minn., created a Facebook application—basically, a customized add-on program that can be used on the site and added to users’ pages—specifically for youth groups. The application sends news updates from a youth group’s website to Facebook so students know what is going on.

Every 30 minutes, the program checks to see if new information has been added to the website by group members. If so, the program updates a news feed that goes to all members, who will see the news on their Facebook home pages the next time they log in. And young people log in to social-networking sites with great frequency.

Schmoyer said Facebook works as an outreach tool as well, because online friends of the students see updates on what is going on at their friend’s church. If an activity sounds interesting to them, then they might visit.

Like Tadlock, Schmoyer finds Facebook to be a valuable tool for keeping in touch with his students and what is going on in their lives.

What the kids are like outside of church 

“Kids put so much of their lives on there,” he said. “It is really telling (about) what the kid is (like) outside of church.”

Tadlock uses Facebook to send out event reminders to his students. Through the site, he can find out who will be attending, who won’t and who might.

Are Christians relying too much on a commercial site not specifically geared toward their needs? After all—just like other major Internet domain—Facebook, MySpace and other social-networking sites have unsavory precincts.

But, Tadlock said, while other similar sites specifically geared toward Christians are popping up, he has not found them to be as useful. He believes it’s more effective for Christians to reach out to the culture around them by taking the best of that culture and adapting it to holy uses.

But one Christian site that is catching on through word of mouth is MyChurch.org —a social-networking site built around congregations. It has about 21,000 churches on it from across the United States and Canada, and about 150,000 individual members. The congregations range from Baptist to non-denominational to Salvation Army.

“It is kind of a MySpace for churches,” said Jon Suh, one of the founders. The site was created about a year and half ago to fill a need that Suh’s congregation, The River Church in San Jose, Calif., felt.

Online community for churches 

The River was using a variety of online sites—such as Evite, Yahoo! Groups and the photo-sharing site Flickr—to provide online content or to notify members of church activities. Church leaders decided to form an online community that would incorporate all those functions into one site.

MyChurch users can send individual or group messages, announce prayer requests, share photos, share audio files, comment on sermons, and organize and advertise events to others in their congregation.

The only doctrinal requirement that qualifies churches to use the site is their adherence to the Nicene Creed, one of the earliest affirmations of Christian faith.

But MyChurch doesn’t preclude anyone from making member profiles and joining a particular congregation’s page.

Churches police themselves, Suh said. Every church has a moderator that watches the content on the congregation’s page as well as keeping tabs on members’ pages as well.

“We don’t enforce too many hard policies,” he said. “We provide lots of tools for users to report content.”

People already were building networks for their churches on secular sites such as Facebook and MySpace. Suh said he doesn’t have a problem with that, because it’s good for Christians to be out in the secular world, pointing others toward God.

“I think it’s just changed the way we are interacting and the way we are doing things,” Tadlock said. “I think it literally has changed our culture.”

TUXPAN, Mexico—Although Dan and Jolene Tucker were commissioned for service in Tuxpan, Mexico, relatively recently as Cooperative Baptist Fellowship field workers, they are no strangers to their mission field.

Through a relationship between their home church of San Jacinto Baptist in Deer Park and Iglesia Bautista Bethel in Tuxpan, the Tuckers have been taking annual mission trips to the Mexican state of Veracruz since 1994.

Dan and Jolene Tucker of Deer Park feel at home in Tuxpan, Mexico, after making annual mission trips there with their home church since 1994.

They never envisioned permanently relocating to Mexico, but after much prayer, Tucker accepted the call to become pastor of Iglesia Bautista Bethel last year.

Around Easter, the couple packed their belongings into a 6-foot-by-12-foot trailer, drove to Mexico and moved into their new home—an apartment above the church.

The Tuckers insist their days are so filled with plans for church building renovations, improvements to the children’s and youth ministries, and outreach projects—not to mention sermon writing, sermon translation and Spanish lessons—they hardly have time to feel homesick.

“Having strong ties and relationships with the people here has made our transition easy,” Mrs. Tucker said. “Tuxpan has been our second home for quite awhile.”

Lacking the crime of Mexico’s larger cities, Tuxpan is a family-oriented community, with many children and teenagers, the Tuckers noted.

The people of Tuxpan are thirsting for God’s word, Tucker added, and his congregation of about 100 people has a heart hungering for missions. The church’s motto is “transforming lives.”

After years of learning from and serving side-by-side with American teams from San Jacinto Baptist, the members of Iglesia Bautista Bethel want to get to work in the world discipling others.

“They are ready to be goers and givers,” Mrs. Tucker said.

The church recently ap-proved a five-year plan that would plant three new churches and start a school for children.

Recognizing children make up roughly half of Mexico’s population, mission workers Dan and Jolene Tucker of Deer Park plan many activities for Tuxpan’s young people. (CBF Photos/Courtesy of the Tucker family)

“It’s a little bit overwhelming,” Tucker admitted. “We need pastors for the mission churches and suitable plots of land for the church buildings. We also have teaching needs, as far as bringing teachers in for the school and creating the curriculum. We cannot do it ourselves, but we can do it with the people God sends.”

Since roughly half of Mexico’s population is under age 18, the Tuckers plan many activities and outings for Tuxpan’s young people.

In April, they held a Bible study and served cake to children on Día del Niño. In May, Mrs. Tucker took 10 youth on a three-day, out-of-town retreat, and the Tuckers planned a day of Bible study and chaperoned fun on the beach for mission children who rare-ly get to go to the beach. During the summer, they helped their church’s youth praise team plan a community concert with games, music and preaching by a guest speaker.

Over two weeks, the church also held four Vacation Bible Schools. In the first week, 220 children attended programs held at three locations in Veracruz, and 90 percent of the participants were non-members.

One of the VBS locations was in a small community where there had been no Bible school for three years.

“At the end of the week, they pressured us, ‘When are you coming back?’” Tucker said. “The adults would come to the VBS and sit in the back. The first night, we had 40 children. The next, we had 72 children and 30 adults. The response was overwhelming. We told them we’d come back and do a backyard Bible club for the kids and a worship service for the adults on the first Saturday of every month.”

The Tuckers also have discovered the people’s eagerness to learn English.

“Everywhere we go in town, people ask us about English classes. It is connected with economics. If you know English, you are much more marketable,” Tucker said.

“We have heard that a worker can increase his pay by 30 percent if he can speak English.”

Iglesia Bautista Bethel started English-as-a-Second Lang-uage classes in the spring, mostly with church members as students, but members hope to turn the course into an outreach vehicle.

With so much going on, the Tuckers welcome church mission groups, families and individuals who want to minister alongside them in Tuxpan.

“What’s really cool about us being here is that anybody can come participate in ministry with us anytime,” Tucker said.

“We are open year-round to hosting people for a variety of missions opportunities, in-cluding medical work, construction work and teaching. Now that we’re here full-time, we’re better able to connect people in the United States with our group here and plug people in to whatever their passions are.”

“It’s not touristy, and it’s not glamorous, but we’ve got a pretty river and beach, and it’s close enough to the United States that people can come,” Mrs. Tucker added.

“The relationships that are formed here—it’s unexplainable. Everyone who comes says, ‘Man, I’m coming back.’ Christian growth is happening all over Mexico, as well as in the Tuxpan teams and American teams. Lives are being changed on both sides of the border.”

Baptists may need to take a second look at their evangelism ethics, a professor of pastoral theology and ethics believes.

Some forms of evangelism may not fit with a Christian lifestyle, according to Terry Rosell, professor at Central Baptist Theological Seminary in Shawnee, Kan., and program associate for disparities in health and healthcare at the Center for Practical Bioethics in Kansas City, Mo.

Rosell grew up participating in the traditional forms of evangelism, he said, and now feels “great chagrin, if not shame and embarrassment, for the things I’ve done.”

That doesn’t mean he doesn’t believe in evangelism, he stressed—just that it needs to be done differently, with thought to Christian ethics.

“I’m concerned about issues of honesty and deception,” Rosell said. He referenced the use of door-to-door surveys many churches use as an evangelism tool. “If the intent is telling them something rather than gathering information, that is out and out deception—and that’s not good news.”

In his bioethics work, Rosell often hears of Christians coming into hospitals—sometimes deceptively—to try to “get conversions” among the patients.

“It’s preying upon the vulnerable,” he said. Patients are at their weakest, and many are lonely and welcome any human voice. Because of that, Christians often think they’ve had a successful conversion, when really a patient just wanted another human presence.

Not only does that evangelistic method prey upon the weak; it also makes a bad impression on doctors and nurses charged with protecting the privacy of their patients— especially when patients feel they can’t refuse someone who comes into their room uninvited.

Christians need to learn to approach evangelism with empathy, he said. “There are many virtues, and one is empathy—being able to feel with other people.”

In terms of a traditional “cold call” evangelism, the practice of showing up on a doorstep without prior warning or interaction, Christians should ask themselves what it feels like to be a potential convert.

“We have all been in this position,” said Rosell, whether approached by a political organization, other religions or a different brand of Christianity.

When asked what it feels like, “most would say ‘not good,’” Rosell said. “You feel like an object. It’s a salesperson approach. It doesn’t feel good to be treated that way.”

Instead of doing all the talking, Christians should listen, he suggested.

“In my pastoral care, I’ve found that what people need is someone who empathetically listens,” he said. “When someone really listens, that’s good news.”

Listening to other people also can earn a Christian the right to be heard, he added.

Jesus went about doing good—healing the sick, spending time with people, Rosell noted. His focus was being good news.

Visiting those in prison, caring for the widows and orphans—“that’s good news,” Rosell said. “I’m not so sure about some of what we do.”

When participating in evangelistic endeavors, Christians could ask, “If I’m one of those being ministered to, do I experience this as good news?”

“If you don’t have the empathy to answer that question, that is one lack of virtue already,” Rosell said. “You might not be a good evangelist.”

Rosell’s favorite example of good news evangelism is a couple from his church. Skip’s parents were the first to sponsor a Southeast Asian family coming to Johnson County in Kansas. Skip, as an adult son, offered to teach English as a Second Language classes to the Asian refugees. He ended up marrying one and raised a family.

Once their children were out of the house, the couple took early retirement, combined it with the inheritance from Skip’s parents and moved to the poorest part of Southeast Asia. They established a home there in a village and started helping people by cooking, making visits and giving money to doctors to care for the sick.

At one point, they were invited to the wedding of the proviencial governor’s son. While sitting next to the father during the wedding reception, the father leaned over and said, “You are good news to my people.”

“That’s evangelism,” Rosell said. And a church was started in the process. “All of the traditional goals of evangelism were accomplished—maybe more effectively.”

Some observers of church life insist the day of event evangelism has passed. They point to one-on-one evangelism as the only effective way to reach non-Christians today.

But does that mean event evangelism is dead? Some evangelists are stepping forward to say otherwise. They declare it is alive and well—and necessary to fulfill a biblical mandate.

“A lot of churches look at evangelists in the past and how evangelists have let them down. And they don’t want to use them,” said Eric Fuller, a 26-year old evangelist and member of Normandale Baptist Church in Fort Worth.

But according to a listing of spiritual gifts in the New Testament book of Ephesians, the evangelist is God’s gift to the local church, Fuller insisted.

“If these are gifts given to the local church and they are not used, then local churches are not able to be as strong and equipped,” he said.

Evangelistic events still are vital to church growth, said Jon Randles, veteran vocational evangelist and evangelism director for the Baptist General Convention of Texas. But they cannot be approached with the same methods used in the past, he stressed. American society in the post-World War II years was a fertile ground for evangelistic events.

“There was homogeneity in the culture where an evangelist like Billy Graham could advertise a little and everyone would come” to an evangelistic crusade, he said.

But after Vietnam, Watergate, and increasing political and social polarization, “the culture is not united,” and the old methods need to be reconsidered, he said.

Because of this, evangelists are encouraging pastors to identify people groups in their community and connect with them through an event like a concert, youth camp, men’s retreat or marriage seminar. Church leaders have to know their culture and community before they can plan an evangelistic event that will work, Randles said.

“You can’t just throw together an event and expect people to show up. One-size-fits-all will not work anymore. Prepare your people to work hard to build relationships, and you will have people come to know the Lord,” he said.

The key to event evangelism is building authentic, trustworthy relationships months in advance to earn the right to invite those friends to go to the event with you, Randles emphasized.

“People respond to relationships,” he said. “They always have, and they always do. You will have a period of time building relationships. You are doing that with the understanding to culminate the genuine relationship.”

Eventually, Randles said, when the Christian and the non-Christian develop a real friendship, the Christian can say: “Now come. I want you to hear what Jesus Christ can do for you.”

Biblical evangelism also includes discipleship, he stressed.

“Evangelism is hard work,” Randles said. “If you lead a person to Christ, then that is just the beginning. That is just the start. Now you have several years of discipleship to help that person deal with their baggage.”

Church members have the responsibility of being involved in the community before and after the event, but the evangelist does also, Fuller noted.

“I see a great need to be actively involved in each community that invites me to their church for a revival meeting,” he said. “People need to know that we care.”

“As an evangelist, I am extremely concerned and passionate about disciple-making. When we go into a community, we stress this importance (of discipleship). We will follow up on that particular church and the progress of those who placed their faith and trust in Christ during the revival week.”

Mike Woods, pastor of Coronado Baptist Church in El Paso, uses a two-year process of event evangelism to make authentic disciples who will reproduce themselves. Every other year, the church holds a four-day revival so church members can invite non-Christian friends to the services. They have seen success with this because the members have earned trust through relationships they formed during the previous year.

“We try to do anything we can to have people understand and see the vision to reproduce themselves,” Woods said. “When people come (to the church), we have two years to cultivate people towards Christ. Then they want to bring their friends to the event (so they can) learn about Christ.

“In the off year, we have a meeting that aims at deepening the spiritual life in our church. We have (speakers) come in and challenge us about a deeper walk with the Lord. It helps us grow as a body.”

Making disciples and using event evangelism has resulted in “solid conversions—people who don’t just have a conversion but who walk with God,” he said.

Another important aspect to event evangelism involves securing a speaker who has the spiritual gift of evangelism.

“How evangelistic events have failed in the past is that (a pastor) didn’t bring anyone different” than himself in terms of style and emphasis, Randles said.

“He brought in another teacher and leader just like him and not someone who is gifted to draw the net (to share the gospel). A pastor can get a person to a certain level (of spiritual understanding) with his gifting, but if you can bring a person in that knows how to draw the net, that person may come (to accept salvation).

“I believe it takes the hand of several people and several different events to get the Holy Spirit to bring that person to understanding.”

COLUMBIA, Mo.—Clyde Chiles has seen a lot of changes in evangelistic approaches in his 52 years as an active vocational evangelist. But he believes the message must not change, and evangelists always must demonstrate integrity.

Chiles, one of 30 evangelists elected to the inaugural class of the Association of Southern Baptist Evangelists Hall of Faith this year, believes event evangelism still has a place as an effective evangelism method.

As a 16-year-old boy, Chiles went forward to accept Christ at a Billy Graham crusade and was counseled at the altar by Graham associate Cliff Barrows, both of whom also were inducted into the Hall of Faith. A year later, Chiles sensed a call to vocational evangelism at a Youth for Christ meeting where Graham was preaching.

“Event evangelism is just one of several methods of reaching people for Christ, but it has always been my conviction that even in event evangelism, the personal touch is necessary,” Chiles said.

“It is my conviction that all evangelism is personal evangelism. Most people just don’t ‘drop in’ to a revival. Someone cared enough to invite and/or bring them. I believe that the role of event evangelism in the 21st century is the same as it has always been—to introduce people to the Savior.”

Even so, churches and evangelists must seek effective contemporary evangelistic approaches and strategies to reach people, he maintains.

“An unusual singing group, a professional athlete, magic or a block party, and all other means to ‘catch the eye,’ are good, but there is no substitute for the preaching of the word,” Chiles said.

As a revival preacher, he tries hard to involve church members in “getting outside of the church” to bring unchurched friends to evangelistic events.

He believes a popular misconception among some pastors, leaders and churches today is that evangelistic crusades are not relevant. But he begs to disagree.

“If we are not relevant, neither are pastors and teachers, because we are listed in Ephesians 4:11 in the same verse,” Chiles said.

“One of the big problems is that we have not honored one another’s calling and that God gave us to the church—his bride—for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry.

“To ignore the call of the evangelist is to ignore the teaching of the word of God.”

Chiles acknowledges churches do not call on vocational evangelists as frequently as they did a generation or more ago.

“Too many churches had crusades that failed because they planned for them to fail,” he said. “There was little prayer, little preparation and when very little happened, they said, ‘It does not work anymore,’” the veteran evangelist explained.

“I have found that today when God’s people pray and prepare, God opens the windows of heaven and pours out blessings that you can hardly contain. It still works,” he said.

“My message has never changed; my emphasis on prayer and preparation has not changed. … The only thing that has changed is the length of the revival.

“In my case, I do everything from a one-day crusade to a four-day crusade and have a plan for each. I have never made the size of the church an issue. God has led me into some of the smallest churches and some of the largest churches, and my gift has been blessed and used in any size church.”

Chiles has some advice for churches wishing to plan an evangelistic event and some counsel for evangelists just starting out.

To churches: “Pray that God will lay the evangelist for the particular type of crusade you want upon your heart. Some evangelists spend more time in areawide crusades and others in church crusades. Some minister to the church more than others. I have always felt that an evangelist should minister to the church and win the lost. I have been doing this for 52 years, and it does work.”

His counsel to beginning evangelists is practical and includes a checklist that requires honest hard work.

•“Build your ministry on return engagements, because if they invite you back, you have solved a few problems, rather than created some.”

•“Don’t quit!”

•“Have a plan that makes your ministry different.”

•“Stay in the word and pray much.”

•“Get acquainted with as many pastors as you can and listen to them.”

•“There is no room for an evangelist that has no integrity.”

Chiles is convinced every activity in a church—including human care ministries—should involve evangelism.

“Nothing should be done through the life of the church that does not lift up the message of Jesus,” the evangelist said.

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (BP)—A single light bulb hangs from a roof beam, dimly illuminating the main room in Maria’s home in Floresta, a working-class neighborhood in Buenos Aires.

There’s nothing fancy about the place—a wooden table and some chairs, a cramped kitchen area, a smoky brazier that doesn’t quite take the chill off the night air. But it’s all Maria, an elderly widow, can afford, and she welcomes the home group each Saturday evening for Bible stories and conversation.

They sit around the table chatting, laughing and drinking steaming hot tea. The group includes several of Maria’s adult children, some friends—and Jason and Kelli Frealy, Southern Baptist missionaries from Longview. The Frealys’ 2-year-old daughter, Daniela, explores the room while the adults talk.

After Frealy tells Bible stories, everyone jumps in to discuss, debate and argue their meaning. Roberto, who introduced the Frealys to the others, challenges several participants to make a firm decision for Christ. Later, they pray for one another’s needs and drink more tea before dispersing into the night.

Could this group be a church in the making? The Frealys hope so. There’s no guarantee it will succeed, of course. Several of the original participants have stopped coming, but others remain faithful.

The door to meeting people in the group opened when Frealy befriended Roberto, a retiree. It was an unlikely friendship: Frealy is 28, Roberto 65. But both are former policemen. The Frealys invited Roberto, his girlfriend and his sister over for meals and wove Bible stories into dinner conversation.

One night, Roberto thanked them for their hospitality but added: “We don’t want your food. We just want to hear your words.”

“We just happened to be there at the time God had made them ready,” Mrs. Frealy said. “They asked for more. They kept coming. It was entirely God.”

The meeting switched to Maria’s home, and a group of relatives and friends began coming. What connects them, besides their hunger for God? Existing relationships.

“That’s one of the big differences between traditional church planting and the home-church approach,” Frealy said. “Traditional churches tend to reach out to their neighborhood. Home churches reach out to people within their circle of influence. You can have one person living on the fourth floor of a building in one neighborhood who invites someone from the sixth floor of a building in another neighborhood who invites a relative from the third floor of another building—and they all meet together in an apartment.”

He calls such groups “relationship circles.” They offer a way to cut through the suspicion, fear and locked doors that prevent Christians from connecting with people in Buenos Aires and other major cities.

“Sometimes driving in the city, I just pick out an apartment balcony and think: ‘Who lives there? How many people are in the family? What do they believe? What are their dreams? What are their hopes?’” Frealy said.

“What I’d like to see is home groups in these apartment buildings. It’s not geographical; it’s relationships. And it needs to be reproducible. Our idea is rapidly reproducing home groups that ultimately will be baptizing, practicing church ordinances and, hopefully, starting other groups.”