Texas Baptist Forum
Posted: 8/04/06
Texas Baptist Forum
Best candidate available
Regarding the July 24 editorial …
Good word: Character.
Good idea: Call the best person available.
• Jump to online-only letters below |
Letters are welcomed. Send them to marvknox@baptiststandard.com; 250 words maximum. |
![]() “This was the worst-case scenario. This was the hardest decision I ever made. The heinousness of a rape is a horrible thing. But I don’t think you should punish a child for the sins of the father.”
Gene Herr
Pharmacist who was fired by a Denton drugstore after he refused to fill a rape victim's morning-after pill prescription. (The Washington Post/RNS) “Churches have figured out what I have known all along—people are not giving because they don’t have money to give. When the collection plate goes by, they are thinking, ‘I know I should give, but then I can’t pay the light bill.’”
Dave Ramsey
Christian financial adviser, on why many Christians do not give more generously to their churches (RNS) “People admire what we do, but they would prefer to worship at a Baptist church or a Presbyterian church or that megachurch that’s in their neighborhood. They’ll donate money to us and volunteer to help, but they don’t want to worship with us on Sunday mornings.”
Maj. George Hood
Community relations officer for the Salvation Army, noting the organization is a church as well as a charity (Scripps Howard News Service/RNS)
|
But so many times, church search committees would rather be led by their human senses than their spiritual senses. That’s the difference between “what I think we should do,” and “what the Lord is leading us to do.”
If committee members find themselves using the former phrase too much, they might call someone who won’t pass the character test. On the other hand, if they’re relying on their spiritual sensitivity to the Lord’s leading, they’ll call someone who will pass the character test.
Another thing that hampers a committee’s work is the idea that we can only call a young man to be our pastor. Many older pastoral candidates already have passed the character test, over and over again. But human eyesight says, “Call someone younger,” and so the best candidate is turned down quite early in the search process. And when the younger candidate has a failure, there is pain and hurt all around.
The best candidate will be the most open, transparent candidate, the one whose life can withstand the most detailed scrutiny. Committees seem to be doing more screening than ever before, in search of the best candidate—credit checks, background checks, fingerprint checks. Smaller churches are limited in accomplishing this, therefore probably more susceptible to a candidate with a less-than-ideal background.
Bob Gillchrest
San Diego
Most dangerous time
If Hamas and Hezbollah were totally destroyed, there still wouldn’t be lasting peace in the Middle East. Governments that live by the “eye-for-an-eye and tooth-for-a-tooth” philosophy guarantee their citizens won’t ever experience true peace. The hellish wars going on in the Middle East right now are sowing the seeds of hate and resentment that will result in unending future conflict.
The life and teachings of Jesus, the Prince of Peace, show humankind how to break the cycle of violence. Christ’s peacemaking principles have been ignored ever since their utterance over 2,000 years ago, even by nations where Christianity is the dominant religion.
Jesus commanded us to love God with all our heart, soul and mind and to love our neighbors as we love ourselves. Jesus replaced the “eye-for-an-eye” old law philosophy with a new and better philosophy of love. Love does the unexpected—turns the other cheek, goes the second mile, acknowledges every individual is important. Jesus taught us to love our enemies and to do good to those who mistreat and hate us.
Today is the most dangerous time in history. We have the nuclear weaponry to totally destroy God’s wondrous creation. It is folly to believe waging war brings peace. Peace will be possible when we allow the better angels of our nature to implement our Creator’s peacemaking principles of love.
Paul L. Whiteley Sr.
Louisville, Ky.
Offensive comparison
In response to Walter Shurden’s address on religious freedom being threatened now more than ever before (July 10), I am left scratching my head and wondering where he has been recently.
In some aspects, I agree with him, but I find it offensive for him to compare Christians who gather together to work against well-funded liberal agendas as “religious right-wing militants.” Christians have rights as citizens, too. Remember how the abolitionists gathered in churches to organize to help free the slaves? What about the civil rights movement that organized in churches?
First Amendment rights and students: Aborting over 40 million babies since 1973 appears to youth as a horrendous abuse of freedom. Huge numbers of their peers have been aborted. The radical homosexual agenda is being embraced. Many youth don’t understand why adults would allow the propagation and acceptance of perverted alternate lifestyles that would bring the downfall of the family as we know it.
As to press freedom: Why would a young person feel good about the media exposing legitimate secret programs designed to protect our citizens against terrorists who want to kill us just so media outlets can profit from a story?
With freedom comes great responsibility. They see too many using their constitutional rights in selfish, irresponsible ways.
Jean Whitmore
Okinawa