Conclave speakers urge youth ministers to remain faithful to divine calling

Posted: 10/19/07

David Platt, pastor of the Church at Brook Hills in Birmingham, Ala., told youth ministers as long as they have the word of God and the Holy Spirit of God, they have all the tools necessary to make a difference in the lives of students.

Conclave speakers urge youth ministers
to remain faithful to divine calling

By John Hall

Texas Baptist Communications

ARLINGTON—Following God’s leadership in youth ministry can be difficult, but it’s well worth it, keynote speakers told participants at the Baptist General Convention of Texas Youth Ministry Conclave.

The time constraints, pressures, and ups and downs of youth ministry can cause burnout and push leaders to question if they should continue serving, said Ralph West, pastor of the Church Without Walls in Houston. But that comes with the territory.

West, whose congregation is among the fastest-growing churches in the nation, asked conference participants to stand if they were considering quitting vocational ministry.

About one-fifth of the 600-person audience stood and allowed others to pray for them. Some individuals standing put their face in their hands. Others fell to their knees. Tears streamed down the cheeks of some.

West reminded youth ministry leaders that according to her diary, Mother Teresa served people who were poor, sick or orphaned in Calcutta, India, nearly 50 years without hearing from God. Even so, she continued following God’s original call in her life.

West encouraged conclave participants to continue following God’s call upon their lives faithfully like Mother Teresa. At times, that requires waiting. At others, it demands following a leader without question. Above all, trust in God is needed, he insisted.

“You need faith in ministry,” he said. “You need deep trust in ministry.”

Ralph West, pastor of the Church Without Walls in Houston, used the story of Mother Teresa to challenge youth ministers to stay true to their calling, even when God feels distant from them.

David Platt, pastor of the Church at Brook Hills in Birmingham, Ala., affirmed that Jesus is worthy of “all of our trust,” “all of our plans and dreams” and “all affections.”

He described his recent experience in East Asian underground churches. Christians—who constantly are being threatened with violence by a cult in the area—sat on small stools for 12 hours a day to listen to him teach about the Bible, he reported.

They prayed for hours, with tears rolling down their faces and forming puddles on the dirt floor beneath them.

“They love the word” of God, Platt said. “They risk their lives to study it.”

Platt encouraged conclave participants to continue ministering, saying they had all the necessary tools to make an impact in people’s lives.

God honors their commitment to him and will work through them, he insisted.

“As long as you’ve got the word and the Spirit, you’ve got everything you need to change the lives of students,” he said.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Cybercolumn by Jinny Henson: Unpredictably God

Posted: 10/19/07

CYBER COLUMN:
Unpredictably God

By Jinny Henson

Laughter is one of God’s finest gifts. Martin Luther, I recently learned, used a form of laughter therapy in his pastoral counseling to people with depression. From the Healthline.com website: “Martin Luther advised depressed people not to isolate themselves but to surround themselves with friends who could make them laugh.”

Laughter is so important because it diffuses life’s pressures, and while it may not change the circumstances, it can deeply change you and the seriousness with which you approach them. It is great to enjoy God and each other together. Church should be a joyous place!

Jinny Henson

Humor was the language of choice in my family, and my Dad was a master linguist at it. I remember looking up at him while he was in full-blown story-telling mode and see his eyes flash as he told the latest story or joke he had heard. Not all were appropriate for the fellowship hall.

I also remember being in junior high when tight jeans were all the rage and looking up from my bed—where I was plopped down, using a coat hanger hook to pull the zipper of my jeans up—and watching my father cry because he caught a glimpse of my pre-teen absurdity and thought that was hysterical. I’m certain it was. Oh, life before mom jeans!

It was easy for me to hear the words “heavenly Father” and view that as something wonderful. I was utterly loved by my mom and dad. My father never was a deacon. His bald spot wasn’t ever big enough. But I have to believe the deacons would’ve had more fun had he been there.

We went to church regularly, and it was in the fifth grade—I was 11—when I gave all that I knew of myself to all that I knew of God. Church was a special place for me. Besides being the place where the best doughnuts could be found, there was a sense that God was not only accessible but up to something good.

I had people who poured good things into my life and always affirmed the fact God could do something special with my life. If we communicate anything with clarity, it should be that not only Jesus died because he wants you to be with him forever, but also that he wants to partner with you to bring a texture and significance to the quality of your life that you cannot imagine. Right here, right now, in this moment! He wants to bring newness with his presence, which gives you fresh eyes to see your circumstances in the context of his world.

I had many mentors—Sunday school teachers and others who helped to place God’s lens of possibility over mine.

I had a female youth minister in Middle School; Candy Smith. She was just plain hilarious, kind, radically in love with Jesus and in love with us, as well. She played guitar and was my model in ministry. I have never met a funnier, godly person. She just had so much love to give us. My parents were funny, but Candy was funny and could quote Scripture at the same time. Faith met funny in Candy Smith. She challenged me, took us on mission trips to Mexico and was Jesus with a Dorothy Hamill haircut. Hey, it was the ’80s.

God placed people square in my path to challenge me to live a life worthy of the prize. This meant being a good, churchgoing girl. I may have done comedy routines at church camp (I was Rosanne Rosannadanna at youth camp, a little zany,) but I was definitely the good girl in middle school and high school. I didn’t want to disappoint God.

I took standardized tests that only allowed for the first six letters of my first name, Virginia, to be entered. You get the point. I was proud nonetheless of my status.

I had faith figured out: I do A, and God responds with B. I am faithful, and God blesses my life. That’s what I always expected. It’s is a wonderful formula. We even see in some examples in Scripture that Noah was faithful and got rescued. The servant in Luke 19 was rewarded for doubling his master’s money and is called the faithful servant. Enoch was “taken away” (Genesis 5:21-24) because God was pleased with him and his faithfulness—saved from death. Pretty cool, huh?

So, here in my Eternal Treat Bag view of God, I bought his grace with my performance. Things were not perfect for me, but nonetheless, I clung to my formula, which was fed by the glorious stories of reward for the faithful and punishment for the slacker. You knew there was always Job, but he was a good object lesson, and that would never happen to me.

My faith was pretty well constructed in my early 20s. I had a protective web of reason, and God was so cool back then. He acted most of the time just like I desired him to. There were little details—like me wanting to find the right person to grow old and wrinkly with and just how God would turn my most wacky idea of humor into ministry—but those things would come in relatively short time. There were challenges, but none monumental, and John 10:10’s abundant life was the norm that would balance me back to level. I lived that abundant life.

In our wedding vows, Dr. Cunningham told John and me that being in ministry would not protect us from life’s hurts. I thought that was an obvious statement. I did not expect God to give me a perfect life, but a blessed one as I performed and he rewarded, just like I had expected him to do. Call it naiveté, or untried faith, but God grew much more wild and unpredictable as I got older.

My world got bigger by the day in my 20s—in amazing and challenging ways. God provided incredible ministry experiences for us and moved in huge ways when we had no idea what we were doing. At other times, with similar work ethic, prayer and perseverance, God did not see fit to reward. He even allowed challenges beyond what I thought I could bear.

The hardest were personal losses as John’s mom and my dad died from cancer within two years of each other despite fasting, praying and holding my right leg up and sticking my tongue out. Sometimes, I was devastated to learn, A + B does not equal C, no matter how desperately you want it to.

I have learned that life is a fluid, not static, endeavor. Our God is always moving in us and in our world and is most certainly up to something incredible if we will lay aside our expectations for returns on investments. As much as we want to figure out what we are due, God always trumps it with his economy, which if we could reduce it would be a much easier path to follow.

In God’s economy, we are forgiven, period. We may wait for the words “will you forgive me?” from others who have caused us hurt, but God is far too busy for that. He loves and for some reason desires fellowship with us but does not wait for us to make the first move. He made it long ago by his sacrifice and continues making it daily as he woos us like a lover.

I have ceased to read Scripture for the payoff, searching for the quickest path to the greatest reward. I recognize myself so easily in the worker who expected his all-day work to be eight times that of the guy hired at 4 p.m., an hour before the whistle blows. I realize that I have too often been envious of God’s kindness to the latecomers in the labor.

Luke 4:12 is a vivid image of temptation, but not only the temptation of Jesus. It is a temptation I face as a Christ-follower seeking a paradigm I can wrap my arms around: The devil plucked out Scripture and sought to manipulate Jesus, subsequently, tempting him to put God to the test.

“The devil led Jesus to Jerusalem and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. ‘If you are the son of God, throw yourself down from here, for it is written: “He will command his angels concerning you to guard you carefully; they will lift you up in their hands so that you will not strike your foot against a stone”’ and Jesus responded: ‘Do not put The Lord your God to the test.’”

I have likewise plucked out verses here and there and bet my emotional wad that Jesus would come through. Not that it was always an utterly selfish request; it was simply my request, counting on God to answer my way.

I am hesitant to reduce God to a formula you can master in three easy steps. I do believe that modeling my life after Jesus just as perfectly as I can will lead to the most abundant life possible, but I no longer have blueprints for how that should look. I am learning to hold on loosely to blessings and tightly to an invisible God whose hand I rest in and bear my name.

I no longer squeeze into my jeans. For that fact, the world should thank me. Other women my age still do. Just visit your local Wal-Mart for the visual. I am now officially old because I believe completely that clothing should not be painful. Or, as O’Rourke implores, “Never wear anything that scares the cat.”

Part of the beauty of growing in faith is that, additionally, I have stopped cramming God into what I want him to be and come to accept him in his glorious unpredictability. Life is more confounding and more amazing than I could have dreamed. That, after all, is the road of faith in Jesus Christ: Blowing our assumptions and exceeding our wildest dreams.


Jinny Henson travels the country as a Christian comedienne. John, Maggie Lee and Jack are an endless source of material for her. You can find out more about her at www.jinnyhenson.com


News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Texas Baptist churches, in the BGCT, the Southern Baptist Convention ( SBC ) and around the world.




BaptistWay Bible Series for October 28: It’s a victorious life

Posted: 10/19/07

BaptistWay Bible Series for October 28

It’s a victorious life

• Romans 8:12-39

By Andrew Daugherty

Christ Church, Rockwall

My wife is an adoption counselor. Every day, she lives with the realities of eager families, some who have been waiting for the adoption of their children for more than two years. The labor pains of adopting parents goes beyond nine months of waiting and one anxious trip to the hospital for a delivery. Their labor pains include awaiting word about referrals of children in China and Guatemala, loads of paperwork and getting notice of when they will be able to travel to meet their child for the first time.

They ache with anticipation of the future when their family will feel complete. Their prayers are mingled with questions like these: Why is this process taking so long? Will this ever really happen for us? Is our daughter going to be healthy? Will we be able to connect with her? Will we love her as if she were born to us? Will she love us as if she were born to us?

In this passage of Scripture, the Apostle Paul captures both the intimacy of God’s parental relationship with human beings and the ache of anticipation for the future redemption of God’s children. Paul insists that all who are led by the Spirit of God are children of God (v. 14). Even more, these children of God did not receive a spirit of slavery to fall back into fear but rather received a spirit of adoption (v. 15).

If Jews are children of Abraham according to the flesh, then Christians are children of God according to the spirit of adoption. If Christ, God’s own son, is dwelling in them, then such children enjoy all the privileges and responsibilities of being part of the family of God. The gift of Christ assigns equal status to those of us who are God’s adopted children. Any human being who is led by the Spirit of God is indeed a child of God.

Paul moves quickly to deal with the real life ramifications of being God’s children. His curious language that if we suffer with Christ we may also be glorified with Christ (v. 17) is explained more fully in verses 18-27.

Paul addresses the reality that even while he affirms future hope in God, the world in which they live is dangerous and sinful as ever before. How does being God’s adopted children make any real difference when they still are suffering and being persecuted? What are the benefits of being God’s adopted children if they still are vulnerable to violence?

Paul says that what we now see is nothing compared to what will be. This present suffering is not worth comparing to the glory that will one day be revealed (v. 18).

Paul considers the present sufferings as participation in the birth pangs of an entirely new creation. Until such a future in God is fully revealed, however, it remains a matter of hope. Hope is what motivates people led by the Spirit of God to envision new possibilities from God that go far beyond the limits of human possibilities. If all of creation is groaning, as Paul says, it means we live in the tension between suffering and hope. Paul compares this process to the suffering of birthing mothers. Hope remains in spite of the visible evidence to the contrary.

We feel this tension more than ever before. Twenty-four hour cable news provides snapshots and sound-bytes of a world where if there were no bad news to report, there would be no news at all. Exponential suicide rates, poverty, sickness, school violence, wars and rumors of wars, and famine and genocide headline the importance and concern people have with radical evil and untimely death. Spoiled life, exploitation and unfulfilled longings of every kind are grim reminders that the stammering and stuttering attempts to affirm a spiritual hope for tomorrow are always done in the shadow of the cross.

Paul articulates the tensions all of us live between—the realities portrayed by cable news and the Christian conviction of the cosmic victory over death achieved in the resurrection of Christ.

Of course another image is raised when one juxtaposes the Dallas Morning News and the good news of the Bible. With the newspaper in one hand and the Bible in the other, we ask: How can one truly look at the world the way it is and make the audacious claim that Christ has accomplished some cosmic victory through Christ’s resurrection?

One helpful theological analogy is made by John T. Robinson. He contends this tension can be described as the “already” and “not yet” of the kingdom of God. Perhaps ironically, he uses the military metaphor of D-day and V-day to acknowledge the power of evil and suffering in our world while affirming future hope in God. With this analogy, the life of Jesus marks the beginning of the end of human suffering. Although the success of the mission appears doubtful at times, the victory of the mission is assured.

The present state of affairs in the world indicates the mission is far from complete. As the people of God, participants now in the kingdom of God, there is a measure of responsibility to combat oppressive and violent forces in the world that lead to human suffering of all kinds.

In the scheme of the “already” and the “not yet,” the sort of life Jesus lived is the nature of life as it will be when God’s will is done on earth as it is in heaven. It reveals the world as God wants it in a single human being. However, as Paul mentions in this passage of Scripture, the kingdom of God awaits final completion. The ultimate redemption of creation still is incomplete. The difference between the “already” and the “not yet” is as different as crucifixion and resurrection.

Certainly Christians are not called to close their eyes to suffering and live in denial about the state of our outward world nor the state of our individual inward worlds. But the Christian story says resurrection has the final word on all these states of affairs. Our confidence and conviction of future hope in God is rooted in the love revealed in the Jesus of the Gospels. If God’s love is as powerful as Jesus says it is, then resurrection is a cosmic preview of Christ’s love that will triumph over every imaginable power that seeks to destroy the well-being of all creation.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Storylist for 10/22/07 issue

Storylist for week of 10/22/07

TAKE ME TO: Top Story |  Texas |  Opinion |  Baptists |  Faith & Culture |  Book Reviews |  Classifieds  |  Departments  |  Bible Study





Same story, new language


Revised version of book Baylor rejected explores issues of faith and learning

BGCT offers seminar track for certification

BGCT annual meeting slated to feature Rick Warren, historic presidential election

Motion calls for committee with 2020 vision

UMHB student makes service part of daily life

Women in ministry describe journey together

Conclave speakers urge youth ministers to remain faithful to divine calling

Struggling Corpus Christi church finds new lease on life, new purpose

Wayland nurse takes healthcare expertise, servant's heart to Brazil

DBU team hits home run with Guatemalan children

Whites participate quietly in African-American Baptist body

On the Move

Around the State

Texas Tidbits

Same Story, New Language
Same story, new language

Churches use podcasts as portable outreach tool

Churches of all sizes can use technology



Church gives away 24,000 books in one day inside S.C. prisons

CBF council OKs UN anti-poverty goals, hears of year-end budget shortfall

Midwestern Seminary board meeting ends without action against Roberts

Baptist Briefs


Young people see Christians as judgmental, study shows

Theology keeps Mormons from entering Christian mainstream

Scholars say evangelicals and their votes are shifting

Iraqi Christians face choice – flee or live in fear

Faith changed best-selling novelist's world

Faith Digest



Classified Ads

Texas Baptist Forum

Cartoon

On the Move

Around the State


EDITORIAL: Look to horizon for BGCT perspective

DOWN HOME: About time for a technology sabbath

TOGETHER: Staff reduction better sooner than later

2nd Opinion: Prioritize equipping & edifying

Texas Baptist Forum

Cybercolumn by Jinny Henson: Unpredictably God



BaptistWay Bible Series for October 21: It's God's life in you

Bible Studies for Life Series for October 21: The heart of the matter

Explore the Bible Series for October 21: Practice genuine purity

BaptistWay Bible Series for October 28: It's a victorious life

Bible Studies for Life Series for October 28: RESPECT–Find out what it means

Explore the Bible Series for October 28: Centered on Christ


Previously Posted:
Gunter resigns as BGCT chief operating officer

Carolyn Porterfield resigns as Texas WMU chief

DBU president hospitalized for leukemia

Book by former student-body president aims to correct record on Little Rock


See articles from the previous 10/15/07 issue here.




BGCT presidential nominees discuss challenges, relationships

Posted: 10/19/07

BGCT presidential nominees
discuss challenges, relationships

The two announced nominees for president of the Baptist General Convention of Texas answered questions posed by the Baptist Standard.

Joy Fenner, executive director emeritus of Woman’s Missionary Union of Texas, and David Lowrie, pastor of First Baptist Church in Canyon, responded by e-mail to a list of questions submitted by the Standard.

Joy Fenner David Lowrie

Fenner, a former missionary to Japan, was elected first vice president of the BGCT last year. She has been endorsed by leaders of Texas Baptists Committed, a political group created to protect the BGCT from the fundamentalist movement that gained control of the Southern Baptist Convention in the 1980s and early 1990s.

Steve Wells, pastor of South Main Baptist Church in Houston, will nominate Fenner, who led Texas WMU from 1981 to 2001.

Lowrie has been pastor of five Baptist churches since he entered the ministry in 1982—First Baptist of Canyon in West Texas, First Baptist of Mabank in East Texas, Timbercreek Baptist in Flower Mound, First Baptist in Roanoke and Northwest Baptist in Milwaukee, Wisc.

Bill Wright, pastor of First Baptist Church in Plains, will nominate him. Both Wright and Lowrie have expressed the desire to see an “open” election, as opposed the process of the last 20 years in which every president was the Texas Baptist Committed-endorsed nominee.

Here are Fenner’s and Lowrie’s verbatim responses to the questions posed by the Standard:

Why are you willing to be nominated for the BGCT presidency?

Fenner: A number of respected people encouraged me to be a nominee for two primary reasons—to cast a vision of missions for a new day, while still valuing our cooperative missions heritage; (and) to validate the leadership of women at the convention level. In addition, I have a deep personal gratitude for Texas Baptists for the support given me as a missionary and a missions leader.

Lowrie: Our convention stands at a crossroads with a chance to bring unity and healing to Texas Baptists. My background and experiences have uniquely prepared me to lead our convention as we bring Baptist believers together under a common quest for cooperation. We need fresh eyes to take a hard look at our struggles and a fresh voice to call us to action.

What distinctive perspectives would you bring to the president’s office?

Fenner: A recognition and value of our diverse churches, a network of relationships, multi-cultural experience, administrative skills for leading volunteers, an understanding of the role of president, and a passion for missions.

Lowrie: I have the unique opportunity to be a second-generation BGCT president. I grew up with a deep love and devotion to our convention’s unifying mission. In addition, I have had the honor to serve Texas Baptist churches for over 25 years. I have served churches in East Texas, West Texas, Central Texas and the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. Ordinary, yet remarkable, believers filled the pews of these churches. These experiences gave me a unique understanding of the diversity of our great state, its churches and how its members sought to make a positive difference in the world. Plus, I have been a church planter and a sponsor church pastor in every church I have served, so I understand the nuances of starting new churches from the inside. I also serve a loyal BGCT church that has a working relationship with the SBC.

What should be the BGCT’s primary emphasis in the coming year?

Fenner: Cast a vision compelling enough that will engage our congregations to do something bold in missions and ministry that would impact each unique local community and the world.

Lowrie: As in every year, our emphasis needs to be mobilizing the greatest missionary force in Texas to touch our communities, and from there, the ends of the earth. Unity comes as we listen for the voice of God emerging from the voices of the ordinary and remarkable voices of Texas Baptists. The BGCT’s leadership has the unique challenge to regain the trust and confidence of our churches so that we can move forward together. We can do this by aggressively dealing with the issues that have undermined our trust, while casting a bold vision of how we can start more churches, reach and keep more people, encourage our struggling churches, train and equip our students, and minister to the least of these together.

What is the greatest challenge facing the BGCT?

Fenner: The challenges are many—apathy, perceived irrelevance, a need to regain trust.

Lowrie: I believe we have lost connection with many of our churches. During the days of in-fighting, too many of our people watched from the sidelines but were not active participants in the solution; at times they felt like no one was listening. During that time, our vision and direction were determined by a dedicated handful of well-intentioned leaders. If we are going to move forward, I believe we need a unified voice of the many.

In addition, we are losing a generation of young leaders who believe the BGCT is out-of-touch and irrelevant. Our younger generations came to those unfortunate conclusions by growing up watching us fight among ourselves for position and power. They want a mission worth dying for and only see us struggling over who is in control of a slowly sinking ship. By bringing fresh eyes to the BGCT, we can cast a vision around which our young can rally.

How should the convention and it leaders address that challenge?

Fenner: Communicate openly, focus on the basics of what it means to be a Christ-follower in word and action, maintain strong and effective accountability processes.

Lowrie: If we want to connect with our churches, we need to cast an aggressive vision of reaching Texas and the world with the greatest missionary force the world has ever seen. We need to cast a vision that is big and bold and will demand commitment rather than compliance. However, for us to be heard, we need to listen to our people and learn from each other.

I don’t think there is one specific leader who has the solution to our problems, but I am convinced that if we work together, we will be able to address our problems and claim our future together.

How should the BGCT relate to the Southern Baptist Convention, the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, the Baptist World Alliance and other national and international groups?

Fenner: During recent years, churches have increased their network of relationships; each voluntarily relates to a number of different entities. As an advocate of freedom, BGCT should celebrate that.

Similarly, BGCT may relate in multiple ways to various entities through networking, partnerships, formal covenant agreements, or simply through a shared vision of a mission to be accomplished. The world is too lost and too needy for us not to work with other believers for the larger cause of sharing the redemptive love of Jesus.

Lowrie: The BGCT should function as an autonomous full partner with other Baptist organizations. We need to look for points of cooperation with them—unity that advances the work of the kingdom. Yet, we need to remember we should have our own distinct voice rather than being a mouthpiece for any other organization. God did not call us to be a minor-league farm team of another organization but to be his people on mission for his glory.

How should the BGCT relate to churches that also relate to another state convention in Texas?

Fenner: A Baptist church has the freedom to relate as it chooses; therefore, we are grateful for those who choose to relate to BGCT and respect their decision to relate to other partners.

I would like to see our churches make their choices based on accurate information, knowledge of Baptist distinctives, and on divine leadership for that unique body of believers. We should rejoice with those who are about Kingdom business.

Lowrie: A BGCT church is a church that sacrificially gives to the mission of our convention. What they do with the rest of their offerings is between them and God. There is no such thing as a dually aligned church.

What role would you play in defining the BGCT’s internal and external relationships?

Fenner: Many do not realize how widespread and complex BGCT is, not only with about 5,700 cooperative congregations, but with its universities, child care institutions, and health care ministries that are located on more than 100 sites in the state. All need to be recognized, valued, supported and celebrated.

In some areas, we need to clarify governance. For example, the elected trustees of a given BGCT institution have the governing and fiduciary responsibility for that specific institution. The BGCT elects an Executive Board from our diverse congregations; that board has specific responsibilities, one of which is to employ an executive director who has responsibility for the Executive Board staff. All of this is BGCT!

Lowrie: I see the president serving the convention as a leader democratically chosen by the people. The president works with the executive director to shape and to cast the vision for our future together and to re-establish the trust of its people. The president’s job is not to oversee the Executive Board staff, but rather to assist the executive director in the implementation of our common vision.

What role should Texas Baptists Committed play in BGCT life?

Fenner: Texas Baptists should be grateful for the significant contribution of TBC for the past two decades. One part of TBC’s mission is “to uphold historic Baptist principles,” and their changing role to focus on that will be a service to BGCT. When individuals and congregations understand and embrace what it means to be Baptist—priesthood of the believer, autonomy of the local church, soul competency, separation of church and state, religious liberty—that strengthens BGCT and its mission.

Lowrie: The TBC should continue to be a voice into the life of our convention reminding us of our distinctive values as Baptists. I believe this organization of highly committed Texas Baptists should continue to play a role in our future because they have earned a seat at the table by their leadership and sacrifice for our future.

A new executive director will be selected in the near future. What advice would you offer the new executive director? What is the first thing the new executive director should do upon assuming the position?

Fenner: Pray for God’s wisdom and courage! Gain the trust, confidence, and respect of the leadership of BGCT entities. Travel the state and get to know our diverse congregations; listen! Engage the next generation of Baptist leaders. Seek collaborative ways to maximize ministries that can impact this state; for example, school drop-outs, immigration, restorative justice, family life, abuses, healthcare issues, hurting people, as well as the fact that half the population is unchurched.

Lowrie: I would encourage our new executive director to lead from the middle and to avoid the dangers of being too highly identified with either one of the extreme elements in our convention life. I would encourage the new executive director to begin immediately casting a vision of how we can do more together than we can as a polarized people.

The executive director needs to come into this job with his eyes and ears open and seriously evaluate our current challenging financial situation. He needs to listen and learn quickly so he can act decisively.

Restoring trust to the middle should be a high priority. If he determines staff changes need to be made, I would encourage him to surround himself with men and women who embody our common values and have skills that complement his unique strengths and weaknesses.


News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




RIGHT or WRONG? Old or New Testament

Posted: 10/19/07

RIGHT or WRONG?
Old or New Testament

Christians call themselves New Testament people. I hear so many moral arguments based on the Old Testament, though. Is there any way a layperson can find some kind of consistency here? I want to be biblical in my thinking and doing.


This ultimately is a question of authority. We Christians believe authority comes from God. We also believe God has revealed himself in history and guided the recording of his revelation in the Scriptures. As we read the Scriptures, God reveals himself to us through the Holy Spirit.

The Scriptures show God didn’t instantaneously reveal everything about himself and his will for humanity. Instead, his revelation unfolded over time and was recorded in the Old and New Testaments. He began by revealing himself through his covenants with people like Abraham and continued through his covenant with Israel. The Bible clearly asserts the fullest and clearest revelation of God came in the Lord Jesus Christ (see John 1:1-18 and Hebrews 1:1-4).

In the gospels, we find great tension between Jesus and those who wished to uphold the details of the Old Testament law, along with all its oral and written interpretations. Jesus said he came not to set aside the law, but to fulfill it. He claimed to have authority superior to what we call the Old Testament, and at times, he set aside or went beyond the laws found in it (see Matthew 5:17-48). Later in the New Testament, we find that God through the Holy Spirit set aside Old Testament ceremonial laws like circumcision (see Acts 10:1-48; 15:1-35).

What does this mean to us as we seek to determine our authorities for moral decisions? First, it means that we affirm the Old Testament as authoritative Scripture. It tells the story of God’s redeeming work that led up to the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. Christ himself affirmed the authority of the Old Testament and worked from its theological and moral framework. To say that the Old Testament has no authority over us is to commit the same error as the Gnostic heretics in the early church. They went so far as to say that the God of the Old Testament was different from the God of the New!

Second, it means that Jesus Christ is our ultimate authority. His life and teachings are recorded in the New Testament, so it must have primacy in our moral decisions. For example, some Christians base their moral decisions about war and violence on passages like Deuteronomy 20:10-18, which call for “Holy War.” Yet they don’t take into account Jesus’ commands in passages like Matthew 5:38-48.

Perhaps the last line of the article on the Bible in the Baptist Faith & Message of 1963 sums it up best, “The criterion by which the Bible is to be interpreted is Jesus Christ.” We must make all our moral decisions through God’s revelation in him.

Robert Prince, pastor

First Baptist Church, Waynesville, N.C.



Right or Wrong? is sponsored by the T.B. Maston Chair of Christian Ethics at Hardin-Simmons University's Logsdon School of Theology. Send your questions about how to apply your faith to btillman@hsutx.edu.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




DBU president hospitalized for leukemia

Posted: 10/18/07

DBU president hospitalized
with acute form of leukemia

Dallas Baptist University President Gary Cook was diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia during his annual physical Oct. 12 and immediately was hospitalized.

“AML is a form of leukemia which is very aggressive, and once someone is discovered with this disease, they are required to begin treatment immediately,” according to a statement posted on the DBU website.

Gary Cook

“Unlike other forms of cancer, AML does not necessarily have stages associated with it, and it is still very early in the process to know what the overall diagnosis is. … Early test results seem to indicate that the particular form of AML that he has will respond well with treatment. Also, since Dr. Cook has remained in such good shape over the years, we are very optimistic about his treatment and recovery.”

Cook, 57, received a platelet transfusion Oct. 13 and began his first round of chemo-therapy the next day. He had a second chemotherapy treatment Oct. 16, and he was placed on oxygen. A third round of chemo-therapy was scheduled Oct. 18.

Due to his low platelet count and the treatments he is receiving, Cook cannot see any visitors. He also is unable to receive flowers, food or phone calls.

Cards can be sent to the president’s office at DBU, 3000 Mountain Creek Parkway, Dallas 75211-9299.

“The best thing that anyone can do is to pray for Dr. and Mrs. Cook, as well as the Cook family,” David, Mark and Nicole, a statement on the DBU website said.

“We serve a mighty God, and over the years, Dr. Cook has turned to God in prayer, and God has been faithful to answer these prayers. So Dr. Cook trusts in the power of prayer, and he has humbly asked for others to pray for him during this time.”

For daily updates, visit http://www.dbu.edu/pr.








News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Gunter resigns as BGCT chief operating officer

Posted: 10/18/07

Gunter resigns as BGCT
chief operating officer

By Ken Camp

Managing Editor

Ron Gunter, chief operating officer for the Baptist General Convention of Texas and the person most responsible for implementing the Executive Board staff reorganization over the last two years, has resigned, effective Nov. 30.

Gunter—a former foreign missionary—joined the BGCT Executive Board staff in 2002 as regional associate in the Houston area. In 2005, the associate executive director’s position was expanded to become chief operating officer, and Gunter was tapped for the position.

Ron Gunter

During his time in that role, congregational strategists were deployed throughout the state to work alongside regional church starting consultants.

The staff reorganization Gunter spearheaded also included creation of a service center to handle incoming and outgoing calls, a research and development office and a congregational leadership section.

But the reorganization has drawn criticism—along with Gunter’s role as part of the executive leadership team who recently eliminated 29 positions on the BGCT Executive Board staff.

“What we have achieved in these years (of Gunter’s tenure as chief operating officer) is really phenomenal, though it has been difficult,” BGCT Executive Director Charles Wade said.

He and Gunter “had a continuing dialogue about the challenges of the reorganization and leading the changes that were involved. Ron came to feel that this was the best time for him to make this decision,” Wade said.

In his Oct. 18 letter of resignation, Gunter alluded to the need for a new executive director to have the freedom to enlist his own associate. Wade has announced plans to retire Jan. 31, 2008.

“Significant, and at times difficult, adjustments have been made which have positioned the convention for further growth and greater service to the local church. As the transition is made to a new executive director, he will now have the opportunity to select his associate and assemble the team that will best serve the convention under his leadership,” Gunter said.

In recent days, some Texas Baptist pastors who are unhappy about decisions made by the Executive Board and its staff leaders discussed numerous motions they might introduce at the BGCT annual meeting in Amarillo, Oct. 29-30.

One reportedly called for the immediate resignation of the Executive Board staff’s executive leadership team—Wade, Gunter and Chief Financial Officer David Nabors. Gunter’s resignation announcement came 10 days before the start of the annual meeting.

In an interview, Gunter said he recognized he has been in “a controversial role,” and if the announcement of his resignation could “help calm things down” in BGCT life, he wants what is best for Texas Baptists.

Wade expressed appreciation to Gunter for his dedicated service in a difficult role. He brought to the post “a passion to shape our staff to be closer to, more responsive to, and more accountable for our work with local congregations,” Wade said.

The chief operating officer’s position is “one of the most difficult jobs in any organization,” he added.

Gunter “has been the one charged with bringing change,” he added. “I am grateful to him for his love for our work, his devotion to help implement the mission, vision, values and priorities adopted by our convention and his absolute reliance on God to sustain and guide him. I am confident God is going to continue to use Ron in remarkable ways.”

In his letter of resignation, Gunter expressed his appreciation for the opportunity to serve five years on the BGCT Executive Board staff.

“I cannot say enough wonderful things about the BGCT and about all the people I have encountered in my five years of service with the convention,” he wrote.

He also affirmed both Wade and Nabors for their leadership.

“I have especially enjoyed the opportunity work with you, Dr. Wade,” he wrote. “I consider you to be a true statesman, as well as a good friend and mentor. It has been an honor to serve on your executive leadership team. I have appreciated your personal and professional advice over the years. It is my hope that we will continue to have opportunities to serve together in the future.

“Also, I would like to say a ‘thank you’ to David Nabors and all the members of the operational team for their support and encouragement, and for their diligence and steadfastness as we have strived to move forward to fulfill the mission of the BGCT.”

After Gunter leaves his position as chief operating officer, the BGCT Executive Board operational team directors will report directly to Wade through the end of January. Dan McGee will become interim director of the congregational leadership section. Gunter had been serving an interim director of the area.

Gunter served in Eastern Europe from 1994 to 2002 with the Southern Baptist International Mission Board. He resigned when the mission board required missionaries to sign an affirmation of the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message doctrinal statement.

During his time with the mission board, Gunter served as a church planter, director of missions, strategy coordinator and mission administrator.

At the time of his resignation from the IMB, he was a regional strategy associate, managing Southern Baptist missions operations in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Moldova.

Before he went to the foreign mission field, Gunter was pastor of First Baptist Church in Henrietta and River Oaks Baptist Church in Fort Worth, as well as churches in Kentucky and Tennessee. He also was a volunteer hospital and police chaplain.

He graduated from Austin Peay State University in Clarksville, Tenn., and Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth.

Gunter and his wife, Cynthia, have three sons—Samuel, Lee and Andrew.


With additional reporting provided by Ferrell Foster and John Hall



News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Bible Studies for Life Series for October 28: RESPECT–Find out what it means

Posted: 10/18/07

Bible Studies for Life Series for October 28

RESPECT–Find out what it means

• Matthew Matthew 5:33-48

By Steve Dominy

First Baptist Church, Gatesville

In Matthew 5:21-48, Jesus gives us six specific examples of his radical new ethic. For Jesus, it is not enough to think rightly; we also must act rightly. The kingdom of God is about more than following a set of rules or agreeing with a certain set of principles. It is about living as a citizen of God’s kingdom in this world.

The implication of Jesus’ teaching in this section is that his followers will live differently than the rest of the world. The six examples in this section give concrete form to being salt and light and having a greater righteousness than the Pharisees and the teachers of the law.

Last week, we covered the first three of Jesus’ examples; this week the second three. All of these are more than just high ideals Jesus sets for us. Each of these deals with the means of transformation in very real situations. The worst form of Christianity is one that is disassociated from real life—one that makes no connection with the way that we live in the real world. Jesus will have none of that. Each of these examples deals with real-world situations and a Christian response in them.

Matthew 5:33-37 deals with our integrity. Most specifically, it deals with integrity in our speech. There are times when our interpretation of this passage focuses on the wrong verse. If we focus on verse 34, “But I tell you, Do not swear at all …,” then the emphasis quickly becomes negative—do not swear or take an oath.

Some Christians have refused to ever swear an oath. The Quakers in particular come to mind. But an oath is needed only if our word is not reliable. Jesus’ teaching here is not so much a directive against taking oaths as it is about truthfulness and integrity.

The imperative in Jesus’ teaching is that our speech has integrity. In each of the examples in this section, Jesus goes beyond the normal expectations. He moves from actions to the motives behind those actions and goes to the root of our negative actions.

Our speech is no different. Jesus makes the point here that our speech gives evidence to who we really are. If we need to take oaths because our word is unreliable, then the implication is that it is not our speech that can’t be trusted; we can’t be trusted. Jesus makes this point abundantly clear in Mark 7:20-23: “He went on: ‘What comes out of a man is what makes him ‘unclean.’ For from within, out of men’s hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and make a man ‘unclean.’” When we are being transformed by the grace of Christ, it is evidenced in every area of our lives. Our speech is evidence of that transformation.

There is an apt saying, “Revenge is a dish best served cold.” We can take that several ways, but the best may be that we are not to strike out in the heat of the moment, but take the time to reflect on what happened. Matthew 5:38-42 deals with revenge. As we go throughout the Bible, we see a standard applied that is more and more strict. The passage Jesus quotes is from Deuteronomy 19. It sets a higher standard than had previously been the law of the land. It expressed the principle of exact retribution and served to restrain revenge, to limit it to what had been taken. But even this did not stop the cycle. It did not deal with the symptoms of revenge.

Jesus takes this principle a step further, insisting on an attitude that refuses to claim our rights. The Apostle Paul deals with a similar issue in 1 Corinthians in two places. In chapter 9, Paul goes into detail about the rights he has as an apostle of Jesus. He concludes: “But we did not use this right. On the contrary, we put up with anything rather than hinder the gospel of Jesus Christ.”

He applies that same principle in chapter 6. When the Corinthians boast everything is permissible, his response is, “But not everything is beneficial.” Matthew 5:39-42 provides illustrations of that attitude, not legalistic rules. All deal with the benefit of the kingdom and transform revenge to restoration.

Loving those who love us is easy. Loving those who reciprocate is something everyone does; it is expected. But Jesus raises the stakes here. We are to love those who desire our harm. The problem with this is that the Sermon on the Mount is not the only time Jesus tells us this is what we are to do. This passage is the peak of the section and reveals to us what exceeding the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees really looks like. Our righteousness must exceed theirs in including others in love.

Jesus gives us some clues on how to begin to practice love for our enemies. The first clue is prayer, yet that is usually our last option. Praying for our enemies allows God to have his way with us in that relationship. Praying for our enemies opens the door for God to have a say in the way we respond. Praying for our enemies opens the door for God to strengthen us in the way that he wants us to respond. Praying in this way opens us to love as God loves and marks us as his people.


Discussion questions

• How would your life be different if you were not a follower of Christ?

• Which of these three examples have been most convicting to you?

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Explore the Bible Series for October 28: Centered on Christ

Posted:10/18/07

Explore the Bible Series for October 28

Centered on Christ

• Matthew 16:13-28

By Travis Frampton

Hardin-Simmons University, Abilene

In Matthew 16:13-28, Jesus asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” Their responses ranged from John the Baptist, to Elijah, to Jeremiah, to one of the prophets. But Jesus probed deeper: “Who do you say that I am?” Peter boldly answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” As we’ll see, Peter had the right answer, but the wrong understanding.


Jesus as a political messiah?

Ever since the Babylonian exile of 587 B.C., Israel anticipated the return of a Davidic king to the throne in Jerusalem. No longer politically autonomous, Israel lived under subjection to foreign rule. Only briefly during the Hasmonean Period of her history—when Demetrius II, king of Syria, granted her independence in 142 B.C.—did Israel achieve political and religious autonomy from Gentile rule for about 80 years. In 63 B.C., however, the ascension of Roman power in the Graeco-Roman world ended the brief establishment of nationhood for the Jewish people. In fact, during the life of Jesus, the Romans still occupied the land of Canaan.

First-century Jews were awaiting the coming of the messiah (which means “anointed one” in Hebrew). According to the prophets of old, the “anointed one” would be a Judean from the line of David. The messiah would establish Israel once again as a mighty nation, as it had been during the days of David and Solomon, when the walls of Jerusalem were God’s mighty bulwark, and the capital city was his holy mount.

These two kings represented the height of national supremacy in Israel’s history. David was a mighty king. Solomon ruled his country with wisdom and, among his many construction projects, had built the first temple in Jerusalem. Those were golden years, with Israel at her strongest militarily, economically and politically. Was Jesus to recreate this picture for Israel? Was he the one to raise the sword against mighty Caesar?

Peter’s answer to Jesus’ question, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God,” was correct, but he completely misunderstood how Jesus would fulfill the messianic role. Jesus came not to re-establish the glory days of years past. He came not to lead a military uprising against the Romans in order to usurp Caesar’s dominion in Judea. Instead, Jesus preached he came to commence the reign of the kingdom of God: “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near” (Matthew 4:17).


Jesus as Messiah for the kingdom of God

What was the difference between the kingdom of God and a restored and rejuvenated politically autonomous Israel? To answer this question in detail would take a separate monograph. To briefly provide a preliminary answer to the question, however, let us look at how David and Solomon failed as kings.

Although both kings initially epitomized hope to restore Israel to obedience under the Law, these two kings ultimately failed miserably at bringing justice in their lands and worshipping the Lord. For starters, David committed adultery with Bathsheba, murdered her husband, Uriah, and did not maintain justice in the land when his sons attempted to wrest power from him. Solomon, for all his wisdom, violated every one of the Mosaic laws given to Israel’s kings.

In Deuteronomy 17:14-20, Moses instructed the Israelites regarding what sort of king should rule over them once they entered the land: the king must be a full Israelite; he must be chosen by God; he must not amass silver and gold in great quantities; he must not acquire horses for his chariots, nor go to Egypt to obtain them; the king must not have many wives.

King Solomon violated each of these proscriptions:

• Solomon’s mother was Bathsheba (she’s never mentioned as an Israelite, and her first husband was Uriah the Hittite).

• Nathan and Bathsheba tricked David in order to secure a place for Solomon on the throne, and God never chose him like he did Saul and David (1 Kings 1).

• More than any other king of Israel, Solomon amassed silver and gold in great quantities (1 Kings 10:16, 17, 18, 21, 25).

• He acquired hundreds of horses for chariots and went to Egypt to obtain them (1 Kings 10:26, 27, 28, 29).

• He had 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:1-4). The writer of 1 Kings also recorded that “as Solomon grew old, his wives turned his heart after other gods, and his heart was not fully devoted to the Lord his God, as the heart of David his father had been” (v. 4).

After Moses told the Israelites about the Lord’s regulations placed on the king, he explained what the kings of Israel should do. They should copy the law and teach it to the people. “It is to be with him, and he is to read it all the days of his life so that he may learn to revere the Lord his God and follow all the words of this law and these decrees and not consider himself better than his fellow Israelites and turn from the law to the right or to the left” (Deuteronomy 17:19-20).

Peter had not dropped his fishing nets to follow a teacher-king. He, along with several others who followed Jesus, expected the messiah to be one who would take up the sword, lead armies and restore Israel to her previous position of glory.

Yet Jesus did not meet these expectations. He taught that he had to undergo great suffering, to be put to death, and to be raised again on the third day. Peter exclaimed: “Never, Lord! This shall never happen to you!” But Jesus rebuked him: “Out of my sight, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men” (Matthew 16:22-23).

How could Jesus, who had just given the keys to the kingdom of heaven to Peter, call the foundational rock upon which the church was built Satan? Peter’s word would compromise Jesus’ mission, requiring the messiah to equate military strength with godly power. The kingdom of heaven, however, was not about political might, but about sacrifice, servanthood and love. In God’s dominion, love, not weapons of war, conquers. Jesus came not as a king like David or Solomon, but came as the Son of God, a servant and a teacher. In this way, Jesus fulfilled the Mosaic Law in ways David and Solomon did not.


Discussion questions

• Who do you say Jesus is?

• In what ways do we expect Jesus to be a political messiah still?

• What does it mean to be a citizen of the kingdom of God? Of America? Are the two the same? Different? Explain.

• Why does Jesus rebuke Peter?

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Carolyn Porterfield resigns as Texas WMU chief

Posted: 10/17/07

Carolyn Porterfield
resigns as Texas WMU chief

By Ferrell Foster

Texas Baptist Communications

DALLAS—Carolyn Porterfield announced her resignation as executive director-treasurer of the Woman’s Missionary Union of Texas in an Oct. 16 letter to the organization’s board of directors.

“I have come to realize that the skill sets required for the position that I now hold do not match well with my gifts and abilities,” Porterfield said in the letter. “It is time for me to step aside in order for the next leader to come who can most effectively lead this wonderful organization into her future.”

Carolyn Porterfield

Texas WMU is an auxiliary of the Baptist General Convention of Texas, partnering with the state convention but governed by its own board of directors. Porterfield’s resignation was effective immediately.

“Carolyn Porterfield has given deeply spiritual and passionate leadership to WMU of Texas,” said BGCT Executive Director Charles Wade.

“She has provided many moments of spiritual insight and blessing as she has led the BGCT staff in worship through prayer, message and song. I am very sorry that the new BGCT executive director will not have the chance to serve Texas Baptists with her.”

In an interview, Porterfield explained the executive director job requires a great deal of management skills, but said, “My gifts are more in the area of leading and speaking and being with people.”

Serving with Texas Baptist women has “been a great joy,” she continued. “They have been a personal blessing to me. I see God at work in their lives, and that inspires me. I see women who persevere for the sake of God’s kingdom.

“I pray that they will just stay committed to reaching teaching and discipling all the nations with the good news of Jesus Christ.”

Porterfield joined the Texas WMU staff in 1992, and was named executive director-treasurer March 1, 2001.

During her time of leadership, WMU redesigned its promotion materials for the Mary Hill Davis Offering for Texas Missions, which funds the WMU of Texas and many critical ministries of the BGCT.

Texas WMU is “positioned better for the future as a non-profit organization because of governance changes that are being put into place, ” Porterfield said.

In 2006, WMU launched multiple regional events called Awakening to replace the long-established statewide Texas Leadership Conference. Attendance at the 2006 events reached 3,600, compared to 750 at the last statewide conference in 2005.

Porterfield, a member of Lakeside Baptist Church in Dallas, is unsure about the specifics of her future but said she hopes to be involved in missions in some way after taking some time off for rest and rejuvenation.

“I know my future is sure because it’s in God’s hands,” she said.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Bible Studies for Life Series for October 21: The heart of the matter

Posted: 10/12/07

Bible Studies for Life Series for October 21

The heart of the matter

• Matthew 5:21-48

By Steve Dominy

First Baptist Church, Gatesville

In Matthew 5:21-48, Jesus gives us six specific examples of his radical new ethic. For Jesus, it is not enough to think rightly; we also must act rightly. The kingdom of God is about more than following a set of rules or agreeing with a certain set of principles; it is about living as a citizen of God’s kingdom in this world.

The implication of Jesus’ teaching in this section is that his followers will live differently than the rest of the world. The six examples in this section give concrete form to being salt and light and having a greater righteousness than the Pharisees and the teachers of the law.

Jesus’ model in his teaching is to call attention to the Old Testament teaching. All of his followers there would have had at least a passing understanding with each of these teachings. Jesus then calls his disciples to an even higher standard than the law did.

This is the place where we usually get hung up. It is apparent to anyone who reads the Old Testament that Israel, and the rest of the world which they represented, was by no means capable of maintaining even the original standards of the law.

How in the world are we supposed to live up to this higher standard? This is precisely the problem that has caused us to skip over the Sermon on the Mount, or to view it as an ethic for a different time. I hope that by looking at each section, we can see Jesus did not give us an unrealistic standard to live up to but taught us how to begin to live to that standard.

We might best title Matthew 5:21-26, “Dealing with Anger.” Jesus starts by saying, “You have heard it said, … ‘Do not murder,’” but Jesus goes further by getting to the root cause of murder, “But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother is subject to judgment.”

First, Jesus in no way says a Christian should never be angry. In order for us to never be angry, we must be apathetic; it means that we don’t care. When something that we value is hurt or in some way diminished, it causes us to be angry. When someone, or something, causes our family to hurt, we are angry. Anger comes because we care deeply about someone or something. That is the reason church fights are the worst. We care about the church, we love the church and that is true of both sides. What Jesus does here is tell us how to be delivered from that anger and live together as brothers and sisters in Christ. In short, Jesus tells us how to keep our anger from causing us to sin.

In Kingdom Ethics, Glen Stassen and David Gushee call Jesus’ teaching “transforming initiatives.” Jesus does not give us a command without telling us how to fulfill it. Jesus gives us a specific way to deal with our anger, to keep it from getting out of hand and leading us to sin. Jesus says if there is a brother who has something against us, we are to go and be reconciled. We are to take the initiative in making the relationship right. Jesus moves us from allowing anger to take over our lives to living in grace and restoration.

It should not surprise us that this is the method Jesus prescribes for us. It is exactly what God has done for us. Romans 5:8 says: “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” God does not allow his anger to go unchecked but gives us every opportunity for reconciliation. He calls for us to do the same. Jesus does not ask us to do what he has not already done, and in doing so, sets the example for us.

Matthew 5:27-30 deals specifically with sexual lust. It follows the same pattern as the previous section. Jesus reminds them of the standard, sets it higher and then tells us how to live it out. Once again, Jesus deals with the issue in the germinal stage. Adultery hasn’t yet happened, but the seeds are there. Lust is best defined as looking with a desire to conquer or possess. It does not mean appreciating beauty. It is normal for us to admire people of the opposite sex who are beautiful. Sin comes in when that admiration is twisted into something other than what God desires.

Jesus prescribes radical action for dealing with lust. Gouging out an eye and cutting off a hand could not be described as anything less than radical. Jesus tells us we need to take radical action to remove the cause of temptation. With the Internet, cable and satellite TV, we have access to temptation at our fingertips. For some, action as radical as doing away with Internet or cable at the house might be necessary. For others, software for which only our spouses have the password might be necessary. The point Jesus makes here is this: do what is necessary to remove the temptation.

Jesus is fully aware of the power of this temptation. He places the responsibility squarely on the man’s shoulders. In that culture, women usually were blamed for lustful relationships. Not much has changed in our day. The women still tend to take the brunt of the blame. Jesus placed responsibility for their actions, habits and practices squarely on the shoulders of the men. Men in particular need to step up and take the responsibility to change those actions which lead to lust.

If we have not experienced personally the difficulty of divorce, then we certainly have seen it in the lives of our friends and family members. It is no different now than it was then, we still are looking for ways to justify divorce. Jesus’ emphasis was different; it focused on how we can reconcile broken relationships rather than looking for ways out. This does not mean there are not reasons to legitimately divorce; it does mean we first seek reconciliation and restoration. Jesus deals with this in greater detail in Matthew 19:3-9. It is a good idea to consult this text in conjunction with Jesus’ teaching in the Sermon on the Mount.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.