Posted: 10/01/04
|
| BGCT Executive Board member Randall Scott, pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church in Paris, recommends the board postpone a decision about a change in the convention's structure.(John Hall Photos) |
BGCT board approves mission, vision, values & priorities
By Marv Knox
Editor
DALLAS–The Baptist General Convention of Texas Executive Board overwhelmingly approved a set of mission, vision, values and priority statements to guide the convention's work in coming decades.
But board members postponed a vote on constitutional amendments that would change the convention's governance structure–a step BGCT observers say is necessary to implement the approved changes.
The 234-member board ratified the guiding statements with only one dissenting vote during its fall meeting, Sept. 28 in Dallas. Then the board voted by about a 60-40 margin to defer action on the constitutional questions to a called meeting, set for Oct. 26.
The votes marked the latest step in a yearlong process designed to chart the convention's course well into the 21st century. If approved, the package of proposals would provide the most significant BGCT reorganization in about 50 years.
The mission, vision, values and priority statements will be presented to messengers to the BGCT annual session in November for their affirmation. Constitutional changes require ratification at two successive annual sessions and could become effective following the 2005 meeting.
Speaking before the Executive Board began its discussion, BGCT President Ken Hall affirmed the proposed changes.
“Our God is a great and faithful God,” said Hall, president of Buckner Baptist Benevolences. “God expects us … to have great expectations for what he is doing and will do.”
The proposals are “recommendations regarding a new day–so we may be faithful to this and future generations,” Hall said.
The proposals do not reflect negatively on how the BGCT has operated up to now, he stressed. “God has blessed us with good present and past leaders.”
But the context in which the convention functions is changing rapidly, and that change demands creative and courageous response, he added, noting, “It's time for us to adapt ourselves again to the present generation and to the opportunities of the future.
“The proposals are an affirmation of what has gone before. They're not change for change's sake. But we're making change so we might be better, serve more and make a difference in the lives of more people.”
BGCT Executive Director Charles Wade expounded the importance of the proposed mission, vision, values and priority statements for the convention's future.
Collectively, the statements describe “what it is we believe God has called us to be and to do,” Wade said.
 |
| BGCT Executive Board members vote whether to postpone a decision on the governance plan proposed by convention leaders. |
Throughout the spring, as the first groups began to work on “revisioning” and reorganizing the convention, the words “reconciliation” and “transformation” repeatedly surfaced, Wade said, noting they appear consistently throughout the four guiding statements.
He read from the New Testament books of Romans and 2 Corinthians, where the Apostle Paul talks about the vitality of Christian transformation and reconciliation.
Wade then read the mission statement: “The Baptist General Convention of Texas encourages, facilitates and connects churches in their work to fulfill God's mission of reconciling the world to himself.”
That statement focuses on “three great verbs,” he said. “It is not the work of the convention to reconcile the world to Christ; it is the work of the churches. … We are helping the churches do this task” by encouraging, facilitating and connecting them for that purpose.
Wade read all the statements to the Executive Board (see sidebars). They provide a guide for helping churches to be transformational and reconciling, he said.
“We want to see lives changed. We want to make a difference,” he insisted.
During discussion on the statements, several board members offered suggestions for changing the wording. Wade asked them to present their “wordsmithing” suggestions in writing, noting a committee could work out minor details.
“If you agree on the thrust of this, then perhaps we can deal with the substantive issue: This is what we ought to do,” he told the board, which then approved them with only one dissenting vote.
But the board showed more diverse opinions as it considered the constitutional changes.
The core of those changes consists of a major reorganization of the BGCT's governance structure.
Chief among the changes is a proposal to decrease the size of the Executive Board from 234 members to less than 100.
Currently, each of the BGCT's 114 affiliated district associations is represented by at least one member on the Executive Board. Under the proposed system, the state would be divided into 30 geographical sectors of 50,000 resident church members each.
Each sector would receive three Executive Board members. The board also would include about seven to 10 ex-officio members.
The Baptist General Convention of Texas encourages, facilitates and connects churches in their work to fulfill God's mission of reconciling the world to himself. —BGCT mission statement |
The constitutional changes also would eliminate the convention's two coordinating boards, which act as liaisons to the BGCT's schools and human welfare ministries; its two commissions, which give direction to Executive Board staff programs; and the Administrative Committee, which serves as the convention's finance, personnel and review committee.
All those functions would be assigned to new Executive Board committees. To accomplish that work, the Executive Board would meet for two days three times a year, replacing the current three half-day meetings. And the convention would pay travel expenses for Executive Board members; current members attend at their own expense.
While advocating the changes, Wade affirmed what has gone before.
“One of the things I've known about the Executive Board–we've gotten a lot of good done,” he said, praising the “incredible leadership” of both board members and staff through the years.
“But a 230-plus member board makes it impossible for a truly governing board to function,” he added. “Members have no opportunity to shape the development of the ideas, of the proposals” that come before them.
And because of the diffused structure, with various components of the convention reporting to various boards and commissions, accountability suffers, he noted.
The proposed changes would offer several benefits to the convention, Wade said.
“The Executive Board becomes the governing board. It sets direction and policies,” he explained. “It also increases accountability to the convention.”
By streamlining governance and bringing oversight of functions under direction of Executive Board committees, the changes would eliminate the need for extra groups and reduce costs, he said.
With representation based on church membership in the statewide sectors, the board could more closely reflect the convention's demographic diversity, he added. And with the convention paying travel expenses, a broader range of people would be able to serve.
The proposals would allow for advisory groups from across the state, which would “provide input, feedback and ministry involvement,” he said. And plans call for reassigning BGCT staff so they will be “dispersed closer to the associations and churches.”
During discussion, several board members pleaded for more time to consider the proposed changes.
“I would love to have more time. I only got the material about five days ago,” said Randall Scott, pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church in Paris, who moved to postpone the vote to the called meeting in late October.
At least six board members questioned the wisdom of reducing the size of the board from 234 to less than 100.
They expressed concern that the board would become less representative of all Texas Baptists, that the board could become “exclusive” and that churches from rural parts of the state would lose representation.
Others asked for more information about how the changes would impact the work of the State Missions Commission and the Christian Life Commission, as well as how the proposals would impact staffing of the Baptist Building in Dallas.
Wade promised to provide more information to board members at least 10 days in advance of the Oct. 26 meeting.
“I am not at all frustrated by your desire to come back” to consider the constitutional changes, he told the board. “In fact, it's probably the appropriate thing to do.”
News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Texas Baptist churches, in the BGCT, the Southern Baptist Convention ( SBC ) and around the world.