Posted: 2/19/04
TEXAS BAPTIST FORUM
Confusing partnership
FamilyNet, the Southern Baptist Convention's television entity, has just entered a three-year partnership with FOX News.
Is it just me, or does it seem strange that the SBC announces it will do business with the FOX network at the time the SBC Executive Committee votes to completely withdraw support from the Baptist World Alliance? Isn't it odd that the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship is the enemy and FOX, known for sleaze, is now a business partner?
What's next? FamilyNet promos for “The Littlest Groom” and “My Big Fat Obnoxious Fiancé”? SBC ads during “That '70s Show”?
I guess this is the part of Empowering Kingdom Growth I don't understand.
Frank Dudley
Harlingen
Inflammatory rhetoric
I would like to comment on Charles Foster Johnson's column, “Now is time to do unto the SBC as it's doing unto the BWA” (Feb. 9).
The Cooperative Program dollars given through the Baptist General Convention of Texas currently are divided 79/21. The BGCT keeps 79 cents of every dollar given. Every year, we see the Cooperative Program getting less and less cooperative.
Now Johnson is calling for Texas churches to defund the SBC and all their causes. This is an irresponsible reaction to the situation taking place between the SBC and the Baptist World Alliance.
Johnson must realize that would mean defunding both the International Mission Board and North American Mission Board and the Texas Baptists who are on the mission field through them.
For the Standard to publish this inflammatory rhetoric is to foster a continued atmosphere of dissension. The question now raised is whether the Standard and the BGCT support this view or not.
Micah Meurer
Amarillo
BWA's 'liberalism'
SBC leaders used two key words to justify their actions–“liberals” and “liberalism.” Those two words hide the real reasons for their actions.
When these leaders began their quest to take over the SBC, word was spread that there were “liberals” teaching in SBC seminaries and such persons should be removed. All seminary teachers and professors were tainted by their broad accusation. Doubt was placed in the minds of many SBC people about the condition of the seminaries, even though such persons did not know whether there were any “liberals.”
SBC leaders espoused the word “liberals” so that they could obtain control over the SBC and become the holders of its main offices and positions.
These SBC leaders have alleged that the Baptist World Alliance is guilty of “liberalism.” The “liberalism” of the BWA is admitting the CBF as a member. Everything was all right with the BWA until that time. These leaders did not care what all the other Baptist organizations did and stood for or what other organizations joined the BWA.
Like an unhappy bully, the SBC will take its marbles from the game and start another game.
Hornor Shelton
Waco
Commands of men
“Crybaby committee” should be the name of the SBC study committee that recommended leaving the Baptist World Alliance. A crybaby lies to mother for sympathy.
Fundamentalists gave up controlling the BWA like they gave up controlling the BGCT. They screamed “liberal” against the Baptist Standard and the BGCT. They compete with their new Texas convention.
This scheme worked once, so they cried “liberal” against the BWA. They made the mistake of quoting a man who was not dead and destroying records. The man replied: “All your allegations are totally unsubstantiated. … I beseech you … to repent and turn from your wicked ways.”
Red-faced, with no evidence and none of the 210 conventions joining a competing BWA, they suggest using “BWA” money for teaching seminars.
They'll probably teach that the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message (which fired missionaries opposed) is their doctrinal guideline. This mandatory creed is an example and a slap in the face of Jesus' warning about “teaching as doctrines the commands of men” (Matthew 15:9).
Every church is allowed up to 10 messengers to the SBC annual meeting. I hope SBC messengers use Mordecai's gallows meant for the BWA to end the study committee's reign of control.
Will you be a messenger to lead the SBC to restore autonomy of the church and individual priesthood and return the CEOs' control to the Holy Spirit? If we can do this, we can stand with all Baptists of the world to lift up Jesus.
Rex Ray
Bonham
Expected Outcome
This is in response to revoking scholarship funds from a Truett Seminary student (Feb. 9). His name is Matt Bass, and he is a friend of mine. He is likeable and charismatic.
About a month ago, he “came out” to me. Needless to say, I was shocked to discover that he was gay.
But I was not surprised by the responses from Baylor University and the Baptist General Convention of Texas. Both have clear and openly stated policies about homosexuality. It logically follows that neither entity can fund a gay student's ministerial education. If either did, then they would not be acting out of their integrity.
I believe this situation will prove to be good for both Matt Bass and Truett. I know Matt will be more comfortable in an accepting environment, and since he is now out in the open about his orientation, he must be feeling much better. I wish and hope Matt nothing but the best.
On the flip side, this can be good for the seminary also. Truett's detractors have constantly accused the seminary of being liberal and even pro-homosexuality, mostly because of its connection with the BGCT and its shaky relationship with the Southern Baptist Convention. Now Truett can show its nay-sayers it is firmly standing on a position that rests well within Christian and Baptist tradition. But more importantly, Truett is upholding God's word by taking action in this situation.
Matt Barnes
Waco
Jesus calls
Scripture shows homosexual behavior only in opposition to God (Romans 1:19-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9; 1 Timothy 1:10). When Scripture speaks to the natural order and marriage with gender specificity, it references only heterosexual relationships.
Even if we discount the scriptural condemnations, there still remains no scriptural affirmation of homosexual behavior.
It is reasonable to believe Scripture identifies homosexual behavior as sin. It also is scripturally reasonable for Christians to call other Christians to repentance. Thus, it is reasonable when Truett Seminary holds a practicing, unrepentant gay student accountable for his homosexual behavior (Feb. 9).
Truett took a loving approach, offering redemption if Matt Bass would repent.
Many advocates of homosexuality argue that their position is absolutely correct but do not cede the reasonableness of opposing ideas. This leads to uninformed, sometimes slanderous, diatribes against those who lovingly try to live out their own scriptural convictions.
Society has fostered a sense of entitlement to a sexual relationship, regardless of orientation. Many homosexuals have projected this sense of entitlement onto Scripture.
Upon seeing the difficulty of making the scriptural argument, they rationalize that God could not have created them with a predisposition to desire something sinful, readily ignoring that all humans, despite being created by God, experience temptation.
Such thinking suggests that, instead of using Scripture to discern God-pleasing behavior, we consult our predispositions, rendering Scripture meaningless.
The good news is that Jesus still calls us all to repentance and salvation in him.
Daren Butler
Houston
Real sanctity
Apparently the state of Massachusetts has given its approval to gay marriage. This is now the topic of discussion everywhere. I am amazed at the arguments used to justify positions on both sides of the issue.
I must say the most irritating arguments are made in the name of Christ. They are irritating because the Christian community says gay marriage destroys the sanctity of marriage. This is a very hypocritical argument coming from a community that has accepted the de-sanctification of marriage by their complete acceptance of divorce among their flocks, most often without any regard for the reasons for the divorces.
The Bible speaks of few acceptable reasons for divorce. But Christians divorce for any and all reasons.
The divorce rate among Christians is as high, if not slightly higher, than it is in the non-Christian society. Christian families are trashed, adults and children are shattered and the bitterness goes on and on. Divorce, the destruction of families and the resulting broken hearts do not demonstrate the sanctity of marriage.
In the Bible, we are told God hates divorce (Malachi 2:16). If God hates divorce, why don't Christians?
Truly marriage is pertinent. The definition of marriage is pertinent. So is the sanctity–the real sanctity–of marriage.
Mike McNamara
Conroe
Condescending tone
In the story “Homeless advocates see little hope beyond spiritual renewal” (Jan. 12), volunteer Charles Little from Cornerstone Baptist Church in Dallas said, “God can help them (homeless) overcome vices that keep them homeless.”
Little's point is valid, but I believe his observation is misguided and hurts the cause of working to remove people away from a terrible situation like homelessness. The spirit of the rest of the article and others in the issue seemed to continue this condescending tone.
My wife and I work with the homeless, and we know a man who has successfully achieved sobriety and is a wonderful example of God's work in a troubled life. Have his problems gotten better? Truthfully, they have gotten worse. After being released from a treatment center, he had no place to go and became homeless last summer. He has overcome his vice, but that hasn't created a new place for him to live, a helpful treatment for his severe diabetes or a way to get to his hometown to clear up legal matters against him.
You can take away the drugs and the alcohol, and homelessness can still be overwhelming and terribly debilitating. God has provided this man with a stronger relationship with him, and his testimony brings tears to the eyes. But at the end of the day, he is still looking for a warm place to sleep and a healthy meal to wake up to.
Scott Jeffries
Abilene
World security
God created the earth long, long ago. God planted in the earth a tremendous potential for the formation of abundant natural resources. They would be used millions of years later by God's most important resource, humankind. God knew one day humanity would discover some of the wonders of God's creation and live in a mechanized world. There would be an increasing demand for the ground's slow-forming raw materials.
Today, it is interesting to note the most industrialized nations depend on less-developed countries for needed supplies of oil and metals. No nation has every resource it needs. Could the purposeful way resources were distributed around the world have been the Creator's means of bringing humankind closer to oneness with God and to oneness with his neighbors?
In these critical times, the world's survival will be determined by how fairly and lovingly neighbors share the earth's resources. God is glorified when people from different racial, religious and socio-economic backgrounds collaborate to meet each other's needs.
Now is the time for nations to put aside selfish national pride and begin to work together in the interest of world security. My first allegiance should be to God and then to my neighbor.
Peace, without war, is possible in an emerging global community.
Paul L. Whiteley Sr.
Louisville, Ky.
News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Texas Baptist churches, in the BGCT, the Southern Baptist Convention ( SBC ) and around the world.